Back to News
Market Impact: 0.2

Top Global Gas Stocks to Watch, According to Morgan Stanley

MSWMBTRPSMCIAPP
Energy Markets & PricesCommodities & Raw MaterialsAnalyst InsightsCompany FundamentalsInfrastructure & DefenseEmerging MarketsGeopolitics & WarM&A & Restructuring
Top Global Gas Stocks to Watch, According to Morgan Stanley

Morgan Stanley identifies six stocks (Petronet LNG, Gujarat Gas, Gulf Development, Tohoku Electric Power, Williams Companies, TC Energy) as beneficiaries of rising LNG capacity and global gas demand. Key figures: India LNG exports targeted to rise from ~26 mtpa to 45 mtpa by FY2030; Gujarat Gas volume CAGR of 7.8% for FY2026–2028 with EBITDA forecast at Rs5.7/scm; TC Energy announced C$5bn of new projects in the past 12 months with C$9bn expected over the next 12 months. The firm highlights strong infrastructure and contractual protections as upside drivers while noting regulatory and utilization risks, implying a sector-positive but cautious outlook.

Analysis

The structural arbitrage here is between long‑dated, contracted cash flows and short‑term LNG price volatility. Owners of fee‑based pipeline capacity and long‑tenor take‑or‑pay contracts gain optionality as spot spreads widen: marginal ton volatility increases the value of stable spreads and raises barriers for merchant terminals that must secure cargoes and shipping. A second‑order beneficiary set: fabrication yards, compressor OEMs, and specialist EPC contractors — a multiyear capex wave will lift service margins even if some pipeline FIDs slip, because lead times for skilled labor and long‑lead equipment create bottlenecks that compress contractor supply and defend margins. Key catalysts cluster on a 3–24 month horizon: FID announcements, major permitting decisions, and 1H–2H LNG cargo arbitrage windows (Henry Hub vs JKM/TTF) that reprice takeaway value. Tail risks are asymmetric and slow: a China demand shock or accelerated renewable + storage build could shave util rates over 12–36 months, while permitting/court setbacks can delay value realization by multiple years and reprice project NAVs. Interest rates and credit spreads are a nearer‑term knock — higher funding costs can push project economics past sponsors’ internal hurdles even if demand fundamentals stay intact. Contrarian read: the market underestimates the premium paid for de‑risked fee cash flows in a world of higher political/regulatory uncertainty. That implies large, investment‑grade pipeline owners derive optionality not captured in static DCFs — the proper comparator is not other midstream equities but a blend of long‑dated utility yields plus growth optionality. Conversely, merchant LNG terminals and asset‑heavy new entrants face a two‑way squeeze: higher capex for emissions/permit compliance and margin pressure when arbitrage compresses, making them the more cyclical levered exposure.