Back to News
Market Impact: 0.05

Missed Your RMD In 2025? Here's How to Minimize IRS Penalties in 2026.

NDAQ
Tax & TariffsRegulation & LegislationInvestor Sentiment & PositioningMarket Technicals & Flows
Missed Your RMD In 2025? Here's How to Minimize IRS Penalties in 2026.

Missing a required minimum distribution (RMD) can trigger a punitive 25% IRS penalty on the missed amount, though corrections generally reduce the penalty to 10% if made within two years and the IRS may waive penalties for reasonable errors. Vanguard data cited: almost 7% of IRA holders missed RMDs in 2024, incurring an average penalty above $1,100. Managers should note the potential for forced or accelerated withdrawals to create modest portfolio outflows and advise clients to schedule RMDs or consult tax professionals to minimize tax drag and administrative risk.

Analysis

Market structure: RMD rules create a predictable, calendar-driven liquidity event concentrated in Q4 (peak withdrawals by Dec 31) that benefits intermediaries (exchanges, custodians, fund managers) through elevated trading and fee capture and hurts cash-constrained retirees who face forced selling or taxes (25% penalty cut to 10% if corrected within 2 years). With ~7% of Vanguard IRAs missing RMDs in 2024 and average penalties ~ $1,100, expect a lumpier flow profile in the next 12–24 months as catch-up distributions are taken, boosting end-of-year volume by an incremental few percentage points vs. average daily volume (ADVs) in equities and fixed income. Competitive dynamics favor scale (BLK, STT, NDAQ, SCHW) and automation vendors that offer scheduled RMDs or tax-filing help, increasing switching costs for smaller custodians. Risk assessment: Tail risks include sudden IRS policy changes (wider waivers or penalty increases) or mass operational failures at major custodians during December that could freeze distributions and spike litigation; low-probability but high-impact given multi-trillion IRA/401(k) pool. Short-term (days–weeks) risk is execution and liquidity compression around Dec 15–31; medium-term (months) risk is higher realized volatility as missed RMDs are corrected; long-term (years) is demographic-driven rising mandatory outflows increasing fixed-income demand and downward pressure on price-insensitive asset allocation. Hidden dependencies: robo-advisor scheduling, tax-software adoption, and Q4 marketing by advisors materially change the timing and magnitude of flows; catalyst windows are IRS guidance (next 30–60 days) and custodial earnings commentary in Q4. Trade implications: Direct plays: favor exchanges/custodial fee-takers (NDAQ, SCHW, BLK, STT) into Nov–Jan to capture elevated trade volumes and rebalancing flows; position size 1–3% portfolio each, hold Nov 1–Jan 15 and trim if Dec ADV < +10% vs. Oct. Pair trade: long SPY / short IWM (1:1) from Nov 1 to Jan 15 to exploit likely large-cap preference during forced selling; target capture 1–3% relative outperformance. Options: buy Dec 3rd-week 2–4% OTM puts on IWM as a low-cost hedge (0.5–1% notional) and sell covered calls on NDAQ or BLK to monetize elevated premiums. Contrarian angles: Consensus focuses on penalties; it underestimates behavioral follow-through — many missed RMDs will be corrected quickly, concentrating selling into a narrow window and amplifying seasonality, which could overstate permanent outflows. Reaction may be underdone for exchanges and tax-software vendors but overdone for small-cap cyclicals exposed to retiree redemptions; historical parallel: tax-loss selling amplified Dec volatility but reversed in January—expect mean reversion by mid-Jan. Unintended consequence: wider adoption of scheduled RMD automation could make these flows more predictable and compress realized volatility over 1–3 years, reducing the long-term trade opportunity.