






IBM shares fell 25% in one day after CEO Arvind Krishna said high hardware capex led companies to shift budgets away from software. Preliminary Q2 results showed revenue growth slowed to 1% y/y, with software growth down from 11% in Q1 to 5% in Q2 and infrastructure revenue declining 7% y/y. Despite the drawdown, the article notes IBM’s P/E is down to ~19 (multi-year low) and total returns have outperformed the S&P 500 under Krishna, with Red Hat growing 11% y/y and $2B of CHIPS Act-funded quantum foundry investment plus $10B planned over five years.
The selloff is really a reset of IBM’s growth-duration premium, not a judgment on current earnings power. When enterprise buyers redirect spend from software to infrastructure, the first-order damage is to IBM’s recurring mix, but the second-order effect is worse: once software seat expansion stalls, renewal pricing power weakens and services attach rates can fade a quarter or two later. That makes this more than a one-quarter miss; the next 1-3 months likely hinge on whether management can show backlog quality and Red Hat retention are holding up despite the budget shift.
Competitive dynamics are mixed. Pure-play enterprise software names with higher growth expectations can absorb some of the same budget pressure, so this is a cautionary signal for ORCL, NOW, and ADBE if CIOs are prioritizing infrastructure over applications. On the other side, infrastructure-heavy beneficiaries of AI spending such as NVDA, ANET, and selected server/storage vendors may keep winning share of wallet even if software budgets stay soft. IBM’s own hardware arm is not a clean hedge here; if it cannot monetize the capex cycle, it loses the one offset that would have protected the multiple.
The contrarian point is that a lot of the bad news may now be in the stock. A sub-20x multiple is not cheap for a low-single-digit grower, but it is also not expensive if free cash flow remains resilient and buybacks stay aggressive. What would falsify the bearish setup is a quick re-acceleration in software growth or evidence that Red Hat is being used to defend share without margin dilution; absent that, the more likely path is range-bound performance with downside on any further guide-downs over the next 1-2 quarters.
Quantum remains a multi-year option value story, not a near-term valuation anchor. The market should discount it heavily until there is either third-party validation of commercial traction or meaningful revenue contribution; otherwise it functions more like a narrative support than a cash-flow driver. In the meantime, the key risk is that IBM’s capital intensity rises faster than its core software growth, which would keep the multiple compressed even if the broader tape stays constructive.
AI-powered research, real-time alerts, and portfolio analytics for institutional investors.
Request TrialOverall Sentiment
mildly negative
Sentiment Score
-0.35
Ticker Sentiment