A year of strikes: US military operations surge under Trump

President Trump authorized a broad, high‑tempo set of U.S. military operations worldwide in 2025, including sustained campaigns in Somalia and the Caribbean, an Iraq strike that killed ISIS’s No.2, a $1+ billion Yemen air campaign (Mar.15–May.6), and a June 22 operation that used seven B‑2s to drop 30,000‑lb GBU‑57 bunker‑busters on Fordo and Natanz and—per the Pentagon—likely set Iran’s enrichment program back up to two years. Additional actions include a Caribbean/eastern Pacific counternarcotics maritime campaign (Sept.2–ongoing) with at least 106 fatalities, Operation Hawkeye Strike in Syria (Dec.19), Christmas Day Tomahawk strikes in Nigeria, and a reported CIA drone strike in Venezuela; the scale and geographic breadth raise sustained geopolitical and security risk, implying potential upside pressure on defense names and commodity/sovereign risk exposure that macro investors should monitor.

Analysis

Market structure: sustained, geographically dispersed strikes are a positive shock to large prime defense contractors (Lockheed Martin LMT, Northrop Grumman NOC, Raytheon RTX, General Dynamics GD, Huntington Ingalls HII) via near-term demand for munitions, long‑range weapons, and sustainment; expect 5–12% incremental revenue tailwind for affected segments over 12 months if procurement accelerates. Losers include commercial aviation (AAL, UAL) and leisure travel (CCL, RCL) from route disruptions and insurance/premium costs, plus EM sovereign risk assets (Nigeria, Venezuela, Iran proxies) facing capital flight and currency pressure. Supply/demand: munitions inventory drawdowns and submarine/Tomahawk/GBU-57 usage suggest tighter specialized ordnance supply — expect lead times and unit prices to rise 10–30% for niche weapons in 6–12 months.

Risk assessment: tail risks include escalation (Iran closes Strait of Hormuz or retaliatory attacks on Gulf infrastructure) that could lift Brent by $20+/bbl within days and spike global risk premia; cyber retaliation against US firms or shipping lanes is plausible and would widen CDS by 50–150bps for exposed EMs. Time horizons: immediate (days) = oil and FX volatility; short (weeks–months) = defense contract awards and margins; long (quarters–years) = sustained higher defense budgets and capex. Hidden dependencies: increased US activity raises Congressional scrutiny and potential export control shifts that could favor domestic suppliers and disadvantage non‑US competitors.

Key Decisions for Investors

• Establish a 2–3% portfolio long in Lockheed Martin (LMT) via a 6–9 month 1–2 point call spread (buy near‑ATM calls, sell 20–25% OTM) to limit premium outlay; add a parallel 2% position in Northrop Grumman (NOC) using the same structure. Rationale: capture procurement upside while capping downside if operations de‑escalate.
• Deploy a 1–2% tactical oil hedge: buy a 3‑month WTI call spread sized to portfolio that pays if WTI rises >$5 within 90 days (e.g., buy 3‑month ATM calls, sell $5–7 higher strike). Exit if Brent/WTI >$95 or after 90 days.
• Rotate 1–2% into GLD (or 3‑month gold calls) and 1% into UUP (USD ETF) immediately to protect against EM FX shocks and commodity upside; trim these positions if VIX falls >5 pts or USD weakens 2% vs. G10 within 30 days.
• Implement a pair trade: go long LMT (2% equity exposure) and short American Airlines (AAL) at 1% exposure; set stop‑loss on the long at -8% and profit take at +18–20% or if oil >$95/bbl triggers re‑balance.
• Avoid large-cap EM sovereign debt exposure in Nigeria/Venezuela and reduce direct Latin America equities by 50% within 2 weeks; redeploy proceeds into US defense primes and cash until clear signs of de‑escalation or announced US procurement awards ≥$2B in 60 days.