Back to News
Market Impact: 0.25

Macy's Stock Trades at Just 10 Times Earnings. There's Only 1 Explanation for Why Macy's Is This Cheap.

+1
Company FundamentalsConsumer Demand & RetailMarket Technicals & Flows

Macy's stock has fallen 66% from its 2015 peak amid the ongoing department-store deterioration driven by the “retail apocalypse.” The article notes shares trade at <10x trailing EPS ($2.42) and just over 10x next-year expected earnings ($2.33), but investors still price continued business decline. Despite a potentially undervalued real-estate portfolio (estimated $5B–$15B vs. ~$6B market cap) and last year’s $22.6B sales producing $849M pretax income, limited buyer interest and store-closure economics keep recovery expectations muted.

Analysis

The market is correctly treating the “hidden real estate” story as a poor-quality asset sale option, not a clean sum-of-the-parts. The key mechanism is that any monetization of stores likely converts an under-earning but still cash-generating retail asset into a lower-multiple, rent-bearing structure; that usually destroys more value than it creates unless sale proceeds can be redeployed at high IRRs. In other words, the real estate is a floor only if operating traffic stabilizes — otherwise it’s a decaying collateral base.

Second-order, the bigger loser is the mall ecosystem: anchor shrinkage reduces footfall for junior tenants and weakens bargaining power for landlords already fighting occupancy pressure. That argues for continued relative underperformance in mall-exposed retail and REIT names versus off-mall and better-executing omnichannel operators. TGT is a cleaner beneficiary if share shifts from department stores into value-oriented discretionary spend, while department-store peers face a slower bleed than the headline stock suggests.

The next 1-3 months are about guidance credibility, not valuation. A single quarter of decent comps won’t matter if clearance intensity, promotion, and occupancy-cost deleverage keep compressing margins; the structural test is whether same-store sales and free cash flow stabilize enough to justify keeping the asset base intact. Over 6-18 months, the thesis breaks only if management can show a real turnaround in traffic plus asset monetization at cap rates that exceed the lost operating contribution.

Contrarian view: consensus may be overestimating how liquid or valuable the real estate portfolio is in a down retail cycle. The crowd is treating the property as if it can be sold at appraised value, but the buyer universe is constrained and the cost of closing/remixing stores is often ignored. That makes the stock look cheap on earnings, but still not obviously cheap on enterprise value once the operating business is adjusted for secular decay.

More News