Back to News
Market Impact: 0.25

SpaceX Stock Has Stumbled Since Its IPO. History Says It Could Be Up by This Much in 1 Year.

HRDI
JEF
NDAQ
NFLX
NVDA
SPCX
TSTS
IPOs & SPACsCompany FundamentalsTechnology & InnovationInvestor Sentiment & PositioningCredit & Bond Markets
SpaceX Stock Has Stumbled Since Its IPO. History Says It Could Be Up by This Much in 1 Year.

SpaceX shares (SPCX) are projected to be around $156 about 11 months after its IPO, roughly +4% from the $150 opening price, versus ~3.5% average gains for large IPOs after one year. The article highlights risks from unproven Starship cost-reduction goals (90%+ claim), an uncertain plan to deploy orbital AI data centers, and heavy spending—capex of about $27B in 2025 and $10B in Q1 2026—alongside a reported $5B net loss last year. Overall, it expects elevated volatility and limited ability to outperform historical post-IPO patterns.

Analysis

This is less a fundamental read on one company than a duration trade on the private-to-public growth complex. When a newly listed asset has no earnings anchor and a capex-heavy roadmap, every delay in technical milestones pushes cash flows farther out and compresses the multiple; that hurts SPCX first, but also bleeds into adjacent growth names whose story depends on spending today for profits tomorrow.

The second-order effect is on capital-markets plumbing. If the float trades weak, it cools late-stage issuance appetite and makes underwriters more selective; that is a mild headwind for JEF and NDAQ over the next 1-3 months, though probably not enough to move estimates on its own. Over 6-18 months, the likely winner is not an obvious competitor but proven monetizers in AI and networking, where investors can pay for cash generation instead of orbital optionality.

Contrarian angle: the market may be over-using IPO averages as a prior. SPCX is a binary engineering story, so a single successful launch, certification step, or credible external customer can re-rate the stock far faster than the average IPO framework implies. The thesis breaks if commercialization becomes repeatable or if orbital compute secures an anchor customer; absent that, the path of least resistance remains lower as the market discounts perpetual reinvestment.