Back to News
Market Impact: 0.45

Evercore ISI Group Downgrades CrowdStrike Holdings (LSE:0A3N)

CRWDEVRVTIVOOQQQNDAQ
Analyst InsightsCompany FundamentalsInvestor Sentiment & PositioningTechnology & InnovationCorporate Earnings
Evercore ISI Group Downgrades CrowdStrike Holdings (LSE:0A3N)

Evercore ISI Group downgraded CrowdStrike Holdings (LSE:0A3N) from Outperform to In-Line on June 4, 2025, while the average analyst price target suggests a 9.80% downside from the latest closing price. Despite the downgrade, CrowdStrike's projected annual revenue is $5,234MM, a 26.55% increase, and non-GAAP EPS is projected to increase 19.01%; institutional ownership also increased by 3.57% in the last three months, with the number of funds holding the stock rising by 2.71%.

Analysis

CrowdStrike Holdings (LSE:0A3N) presents a mixed investment profile following a downgrade by Evercore ISI Group on June 4, 2025, from 'Outperform' to 'In-Line'. This revision is coupled with an average analyst one-year price target of 417.17 GBX, implying a 9.80% downside from its latest closing price of 462.50 GBX. Juxtaposing this bearish analyst sentiment are the company's robust growth projections: anticipated annual revenue stands at 5,234MM (currency not specified), an increase of 26.55%, and projected annual non-GAAP EPS is 4.79, marking a 19.01% rise. Institutional interest shows overall growth, with the number of funds reporting positions increasing by 2.71% to 2,763 in the last quarter, and total shares owned by institutions rising by 3.57% to 195,335K. The average portfolio weight dedicated to CrowdStrike also increased by 8.89%. However, a deeper look into major institutional holdings reveals a divergence: while Vanguard's Total Stock Market Index Fund and 500 Index Fund increased both their share counts (0.84% and 7.96% respectively) and portfolio allocations (8.40% and 14.32% respectively), other large holders like Jennison Associates and Geode Capital Management, despite increasing their shareholdings by 17.43% and 7.99% respectively, significantly reduced their portfolio allocations in 0A3N by 23.44% and 39.92% respectively. This suggests that while these specific institutions are accumulating more shares, they are simultaneously de-risking or rebalancing by reducing the stock's relative importance in their portfolios, a nuance to consider alongside the generally positive institutional inflow and the stock's slightly negative sentiment score of -0.2.