Back to News
Market Impact: 0.32

BTIG reiterates MercadoLibre stock Buy rating with $2,400 target By Investing.com

MELISMCIAPP
Analyst EstimatesAnalyst InsightsCorporate Guidance & OutlookCorporate EarningsCompany FundamentalsManagement & GovernanceConsumer Demand & RetailCurrency & FXEmerging Markets
BTIG reiterates MercadoLibre stock Buy rating with $2,400 target By Investing.com

BTIG kept a Buy rating on MercadoLibre and raised its price target to $2,400 from $2,650, while trimming full-year 2026 EPS to $47.56 from $47.95, still below the $53.41 consensus. The firm expects about $3.6 billion of full-year operating income, roughly 9% margins, and about $120 million less first-half 2026 operating income, partly offset by lower FX losses as the Argentine peso converges. Other brokers were mixed, with Jefferies upgrading to Buy and Raymond James cutting its target to $2,250 but keeping Strong Buy.

Analysis

The key signal is not the top-line guidance reset, but the composition of it: weaker near-term margin versus unchanged long-duration earning power implies the market should treat this as a timing shift, not a thesis break. That matters because MELI is still in the phase where incremental capital is being recycled into payments, credit, and logistics density; when the business is compounding share, short-term margin compression can coexist with multi-year equity value creation. The recent FX normalization also removes one of the cleaner hidden drags on reported earnings, which means future estimate revisions can look better even if operating discipline stays unchanged. The second-order winner is the ecosystem around MELI’s credit push. Faster card issuance likely pressures reported provision expense first, but it also deepens engagement and raises switching costs, which can matter more than a few dozen basis points of margin in a market still underpenetrated in digital commerce and payments. If Brazil share gains are real, local competitors face a worse mix of higher fulfillment intensity and lower pricing power, while regional fintech and marketplace names without MELI’s balance sheet get forced into either subscale growth or capital dilution. The contrarian read is that consensus may be too anchored to the wrong near-term metric: headline EPS versus operating momentum. In a name with this much embedded optionality, a small cut to next-year EPS can coexist with a higher long-run multiple if investors believe the company is buying durable share with disciplined unit economics. The main risk is a sequencing problem over the next 1-2 quarters: if provisions rise faster than gross profit leverage or if FX stops helping, the stock can derate on “quality of growth” even if the medium-term story remains intact.