Back to News
Market Impact: 0.55

Gundlach says it’s ‘just not possible’ for the Fed to cut rates

Monetary PolicyInterest Rates & YieldsInflationEconomic DataCredit & Bond MarketsCorporate EarningsInvestor Sentiment & PositioningCommodities & Raw Materials

Jeffrey Gundlach said the Fed is unlikely to cut rates at its next meeting, citing inflation that has not cooperated and a 2-year Treasury yield that is nearly 50 bps above the Fed funds rate. He warned the next headline CPI print could start with a 4, as higher oil prices from the Iran war feed into inflation. Gundlach also said stocks remain expensive and speculative, while renewing warnings about private credit.

Analysis

The market is pricing a soft-landing regime, but the setup is increasingly inconsistent with the front end of the curve. When the policy rate sits below 2-year yields, financial conditions are already doing part of the Fed’s work; if inflation re-accelerates on energy, the real policy stance tightens further even without an official hike. That is a negative for duration-sensitive assets and for any levered borrower that depends on rolling short-term funding at tight spreads. The bigger second-order issue is that persistent inflation undercuts the usual late-cycle playbook: bonds stop hedging equities, and cash becomes a legitimate competitor to risk assets. That tends to support commodity-linked equities and real-asset exposures, while compressing the multiple premium of long-duration growth and high-multiple software names. If headline inflation prints higher for the next 1-2 months, expect systematic allocators to lean into commodities and defensives rather than chase the same crowded AI/megacap trade. Private credit looks especially vulnerable because it has benefited from investors reaching for yield in a world where public credit offered little compensation. A higher-for-longer path raises refinancing risk exactly when underwriting discipline is most likely to be questioned, and the weakest credits will show up first in dividend recaps, extension requests, and NAV marks. The more important contagion channel is not defaults immediately; it is a slowdown in fundraising and a widening gap between stated marks and executable exit values. The contrarian view is that the market may be overestimating how cleanly higher inflation translates into a sustained equity de-rating. If earnings momentum remains strong, the index can keep levitating even as multiples compress at the margin, with dispersion widening sharply under the surface. That argues for being selective rather than outright risk-off: own cash-generative, pricing-power winners and fade levered beta where refinancing and duration are the true risk factors.