Back to News
Market Impact: 0.3

This Old Bull Still Has Legs

Market Technicals & FlowsInvestor Sentiment & PositioningCorporate EarningsAnalyst EstimatesCompany FundamentalsCapital Returns (Dividends / Buybacks)
This Old Bull Still Has Legs

The article argues the cyclical bull market is 45 months old, well beyond the 30-month median, but still supported by earnings rather than multiple expansion. It cites 2027 EPS estimates up 25% and notes that 26% of stocks excluding mega caps still trade below 15x earnings, suggesting valuations are not broadly stretched. Breadth is thinning as the S&P 500 has outperformed equal-weight RSP, but the author remains constructive on the cap-weighted index.

Analysis

The market’s key message is not that “everything is expensive,” but that duration risk is still being paid for with earnings rather than hope. That matters because earnings-led bull markets tend to survive longer than multiple-led ones: when profits are the primary driver, drawdowns usually need a growth break, not just valuation compression, to become lasting top-outs. In other words, the burden of proof has shifted to macro/earnings deterioration, which is a much higher bar than a simple breadth scare.

The second-order implication is that the apparent narrowness is not automatically bearish if the leaders are still converting scale into incremental margin. Mega-cap earnings strength has created a self-funding loop: stronger cash flow supports capex, AI/cloud/compute investment, and continued share repurchase capacity, which keeps index-level EPS estimates rising even if the median stock is stagnant. That creates a structural winners/losers split—capital-hungry laggards with weak pricing power are effectively being starved, while the few large platforms keep compounding.

The more actionable risk is not a crash from “old age,” but a regime shift where rates or margins inflect enough to break the earnings engine. If 2027 EPS revisions stop rising, the market loses its main defense against already-full valuations; that would likely hit the equal-weight index and cyclicals first, while quality growth could still outperform on a relative basis. Conversely, if breadth starts improving without a multiple reset, the move can broaden rather than unwind—so a breadth repair is actually a late-cycle bullish signal, not a reason to de-risk mechanically.

The contrarian miss is that “cap-weighted is overconcentrated” may still be the wrong trade until the market proves the leaders are exhausted. Equal-weight looks cheaper, but cheaper can stay cheaper if earnings revisions remain negative; meanwhile, the index heavyweights are effectively carrying the entire earnings revision cycle. The trade is less about buying mean reversion and more about owning the names with the highest visibility of forward revisions and free-cash-flow durability.