Back to News
Market Impact: 0.2

This Billionaire Was Recently Loading Up on "Magnificent Seven" Stocks

Artificial IntelligenceTechnology & InnovationCorporate EarningsAnalyst EstimatesInvestor Sentiment & Positioning
This Billionaire Was Recently Loading Up on "Magnificent Seven" Stocks

Appaloosa’s David Tepper added to positions in Amazon, Meta, Alphabet, and Nvidia while trimming memory stocks, signaling confidence in megacap AI infrastructure and cloud growth. The article cites AWS revenue up 37% YoY in Q2 (fastest growth in 4.5 years), Meta revenue growth of 28% in Q2, Alphabet’s AI/TPU-driven Google Cloud advantages, and Nvidia trading at a cheaper 17.5x forward P/E (fiscal 2028 estimates) despite continued rapid growth. Overall, the piece is bullish on AI-led business momentum and valuation support for these names, but it’s not a new earnings/guidance catalyst expected to move the broader market.

Analysis

This is more a positioning confirmation than a fresh fundamental signal: capital is still gravitating toward platforms that can turn AI into either lower unit costs or better monetization, rather than pure infrastructure spenders. AMZN and GOOGL have the cleanest second-order upside because AI improves their own economics first, then compounds through pricing power and share gains; META is the highest operating-leverage expression if ad conversion stays elevated.

Over the next 1-3 months, the trade is less about the headline and more about whether earnings can justify the incremental capex. If revenue growth does not stay ahead of depreciation and spend, the market will compress multiples quickly in NVDA and META first, because both are already priced for extended outperformance. A spillover risk is that smaller memory and AI-hardware names get de-rated as hyperscaler wallet share concentrates in a few winners.

The contrarian view is that “cheap” on distant EPS can stay cheap if growth normalizes. NVDA has the most valuation fragility because the market is already underwriting years of scarcity economics, while GOOGL has the strongest downside support via TPU economics and core cash generation. Regulatory noise matters most for GOOGL/META, but unless it alters ad/search distribution, it is more of a multiple cap than an immediate earnings threat.

More News