Back to News
Market Impact: 0.2

Asset Tokenization Market Expands as Institutional Investors Adopt Blockchain-Based Financial Infrastructure

Source: GlobeNewswire

Crypto & Digital AssetsFintechTechnology & InnovationRegulation & LegislationPrivate Markets & VentureHousing & Real Estate
Asset Tokenization Market Expands as Institutional Investors Adopt Blockchain-Based Financial Infrastructure

The global asset-tokenization market is projected to grow from $3.00 trillion in 2025 to $130.67 trillion by 2035, implying a 45.83% CAGR, driven by institutional adoption, fractional ownership and blockchain-based settlement infrastructure. U.S. tokenized assets are forecast to rise from $1.12 trillion to $50.86 trillion over the same period, while Asia-Pacific is expected to grow at a 48.19% CAGR. Real estate represented 30% of the market in 2025, institutional investors accounted for roughly 69% of investment, and private equity is forecast to be the fastest-growing asset class at a 49.62% CAGR. Regulatory fragmentation, smart-contract vulnerabilities and limited cross-chain interoperability remain key risks to cross-border scaling.

Analysis

The forecast’s headline TAM is not investable: tokenized assets are largely a new settlement, transfer-agency and distribution wrapper around existing AUM, so nominal tokenized value can grow far faster than incremental industry revenue. Economics accrue to platforms controlling KYC, custody, fund administration, cash rails and investor distribution—not necessarily to issuers of tokenized products. BLK is best positioned among listed managers because tokenization can reinforce Aladdin, institutional distribution and liquidity-management products; UBS has a parallel advantage in cross-border wealth distribution, subject to jurisdictional constraints.

The key bottleneck is secondary-market liquidity, not token issuance. Until regulated venues support broad transferability, lending, collateral eligibility and interoperable ownership records, tokenized private-market products risk becoming administratively efficient but economically illiquid closed systems. That outcome would favor incumbent managers and custodians while limiting the disruption implied by private-market access narratives; it could also pressure fee rates if fractionalization turns standardized fund exposure into a more comparable commodity.

Over the next 1-3 months, this is principally a narrative catalyst around product launches and regulatory approvals rather than a driver of earnings revisions. Over 6-18 months, monitor tokenized-fund net flows, institutional client adoption, administration/custody revenue, and whether products can be used as collateral or settle against regulated cash. The thesis is falsified if major platforms report tokenized AUM growth without incremental flows, fee capture or secondary turnover, demonstrating wrapper substitution rather than new addressable demand.

Consensus may overvalue public blockchain exposure and undervalue compliance-heavy incumbents. A fragmented regulatory outcome is not uniformly negative: it raises fixed compliance costs and makes global distribution harder for smaller tokenization vendors, strengthening BLK and UBS’s relative moat, while leaving standalone infrastructure valuations vulnerable if interoperability does not translate into paid enterprise usage.

AllMind Terminal

AI-powered research, real-time alerts, and portfolio analytics for institutional investors.

Request Trial

Market Sentiment

Overall Sentiment

moderately positive

Sentiment Score

0.52

Ticker Sentiment

BLK0.45
UBS0.40

Key Decisions for Investors

  • Maintain a 6-12 month long BLK / short BEN pair, sized as a relative-value expression rather than a tokenization beta trade. BLK has the stronger institutional operating system and distribution flywheel; exit if BEN demonstrates sustained relative organic-growth acceleration or BLK’s tokenized products show no measurable contribution to flows or technology revenue across two reporting periods.
  • Add UBS on pullbacks over a 6-18 month horizon only if disclosures indicate tokenized products are being distributed through the wealth-management channel rather than confined to pilots. Upside comes from higher client retention and wallet share, while the risk is cross-border compliance cost without scalable fee revenue; reassess on any material regulatory restriction in major booking centers.
  • Do not initiate a directional position in FISI from this theme. Its disclosed linkage is insufficient; create an alert for explicit custody, payments, stablecoin-reserve, or tokenized-deposit partnerships before underwriting an earnings impact.
  • For digital-asset infrastructure exposure, wait for independently reported secondary trading volume and regulated collateral use before chasing private-market/tokenization proxies. Product announcements alone should not clear an investment threshold; require evidence of recurring fee revenue and customer concentration below a single flagship fund.

More News

From AllMind Research

Browse all research