CELH SHAREHOLDER NOTICE: Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Reminds Celsius Holdings Investors of Securities Class Action Lawsuit Deadline on November 3, 2026

Faruqi & Faruqi is investigating potential claims against Celsius Holdings in connection with a federal securities class action already filed against the company. Investors who purchased or acquired Celsius securities from February 21, 2025, through June 3, 2026, are reminded that November 3, 2026, is the deadline to seek appointment as lead plaintiff; the notice does not detail the underlying allegations or any outcome.

Analysis

The notice is a procedural litigation catalyst, not evidence that the claims have merit or that Celsius faces a quantified liability. With no allegations, loss estimate, or company response in the supplied information, the November 3 lead-plaintiff deadline is unlikely by itself to establish a change in cash flows; any immediate CELH move may instead reflect headline sensitivity and risk appetite. The more consequential path is over the next 1–3 months: the complaint’s specific claims, any amended pleadings, and whether the company discloses a material investigation or financial exposure. Do not extrapolate this filing to Celsius’s entire business or to competitors. The contrarian read is that the legal headline may be over-weighted relative to fundamentals—but that view is conditional until the underlying complaint is reviewed. Over 6–18 months, adverse findings or discovery of material disclosure issues could raise legal costs and increase governance and valuation risk; a procedural dismissal or lack of material company disclosure would weaken that overhang. There is not enough information here to estimate damages, probability of success, or an appropriate price target.

Key Decisions for Investors

• No standalone short recommendation: the solicitation notice and lead-plaintiff deadline are insufficient evidence of liability or material earnings impact. Avoid initiating a directional position solely on this headline.
• For existing CELH exposure, treat the complaint and any company filings as near-term event risk; review the actual allegations and subsequent disclosures before changing fundamental assumptions.
• Set an alert for the November 3, 2026 deadline and subsequent court activity. Reassess only if filings identify potentially material misstatements, quantified exposure, or a company-disclosed investigation or financial impact.
• Falsification of the legal-overhang thesis would include dismissal or narrowing of material claims and no evidence of meaningful financial exposure; confirmation would require substantiated claims or company disclosure, not further law-firm solicitation headlines.