2 Top Dividend Stocks to Buy in September
Source: The Motley Fool
Texas Instruments posted Q2 revenue up 23% Y/Y to $5.5B and net income of nearly $2B, supporting 22 straight years of dividend growth and a ~2.2% forward yield (quarterly payout $1.42). Qualcomm’s handset revenue fell 20% Y/Y and shares are down 36% from a recent high, but free cash flow remains strong at $10.4B on $44B revenue (≈24% margin) and management targets non-handset revenue to exceed half of the business by fiscal 2029, reaching $40B total (including $15B from data centers). Overall, the article frames both firms as cash-flow durable dividend compounders despite semiconductor cyclicality and near-term handset weakness.
Analysis
TXN is the cleaner expression of a late-cycle industrial recovery: analog demand tends to inflect slowly, but when it does, the mix shift is favorable because pricing and design-in stickiness expand cash conversion faster than revenue. The more interesting second-order trade is not “semis vs semis,” but TXN versus other industrial cash-return names: if rate volatility stays high, a durable dividend plus visible FCF can pull capital from lower-quality cyclicals and even parts of utilities.
QCOM is more of a refactoring story than a pure growth story. The market will likely keep discounting handset exposure until non-handset revenue is demonstrably material, so the stock’s upside depends on proof, not narrative; that means design-win announcements matter only if they translate into backlog and margin mix over 2-4 quarters. Relative winners in that path are AI edge-compute and auto semiconductor adjacencies; losers are handset OEMs and any supplier chain tied to a prolonged Android replacement cycle.
The contrarian risk is that both names can be treated as “defensive tech,” but they still sit inside a cyclical earnings bucket. If industrial PMIs roll back below 50 or smartphone checks worsen into the next two earnings cycles, these will de-rate like semis, not utilities; the dividend will not protect the multiple. For TXN, the falsifier is a slowdown in FCF recovery or another leg down in autos/industrials; for QCOM, it is continued handset compression without a visible ramp in data center or auto contributions.
AllMind Terminal
AI-powered research, real-time alerts, and portfolio analytics for institutional investors.
Request TrialMarket Sentiment
Overall Sentiment
moderately positive
Sentiment Score
0.35
Ticker Sentiment
Key Decisions for Investors
- Bias toward TXN on pullbacks over the next 1-3 months: best risk/reward for income-plus-cyclicality, with 8-12% upside potential if analog demand keeps improving and the market rewards cash-return quality.
- Use TXN/QCOM as a relative-value pair: long TXN, short QCOM on any strength if handset weakness persists; expect TXN to command the higher durability multiple, with 200-300 bps relative outperformance over 3-6 months.
- Do not chase QCOM outright until there is independent evidence of non-handset traction; if management confirms real data-center bookings, use a 6-12 month call spread rather than stock to express the optionality with limited downside.
- Set an alert on TXN if industrial or auto end-market commentary weakens at the next print; below that point the dividend thesis remains intact but the multiple can compress quickly.
More News
- Why did CoreWeave stock get crushed this week? Look to this corner of the debt market for clues
- Apple’s $1,999 iPhone Duo puts the company's status-symbol power to the test
- We're downgrading this retail stock after a big comeback. Plus, AI names slide again
- Chip Rout Intensifies and Tesla Showcases Flying Roadster
- All the news about the iPhone Duo
- We are Only 'Third Inning Relative to this AI Game,' Says Dan Ives
From AllMind Research
- Anthropic IPO Preview: Valuation, Timing, and What to Watch
- Shein After the IPO: Venue, Valuation, and What Must Be Proved
- What AI Research Tools Should a Small Hedge Fund Buy First?
- Eli Lilly Q4 2025 Earnings: Revenue Surges 43% as Mounjaro and Zepbound Dominate the GLP-1 Market
- Investment Research Software Costs: A 2026 Budget Framework