Back to News
Market Impact: 0.22

Waste Heat Recovery Market worth $135.33 billion by 2031 - Exclusive Report by MarketsandMarkets™

Source: PR Newswire

Renewable Energy TransitionESG & Climate PolicyTechnology & InnovationInfrastructure & DefenseCompany Fundamentals
Waste Heat Recovery Market worth $135.33 billion by 2031 - Exclusive Report by MarketsandMarkets™

MarketsandMarkets projects the global waste heat recovery market will grow from $92.99 billion in 2026 to $135.33 billion by 2031, a 7.8% CAGR, supported by industrial decarbonization mandates, high energy costs, and stricter emissions rules. Steam and electricity generation represented 57.0% of the market in 2025, while petroleum refining accounted for 28.8%; Europe held a 38.0% regional share. Preheating applications, cement end users, and Asia-Pacific are expected to post the fastest growth, benefiting suppliers including Siemens Energy, GE Vernova, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, ABB, and Shanghai Electric.

Analysis

This is a low-impact third-party market forecast, not evidence of incremental orders; the near-term read-through for GEV, ENR, ABBN and WRT1V depends on disclosed heat-recovery bookings, margin mix and backlog conversion rather than projected market CAGR. The investable mechanism is strongest where waste-heat systems are sold as engineered, power-generation-adjacent packages: higher project content can lift revenue per installation, but fixed-price execution, long permitting cycles and working-capital consumption can delay EPS realization by 12-24 months.

ENR and GEV have the clearest potential upside if industrial customers choose heat-recovery steam generation alongside gas-turbine upgrades, creating attach-rate economics rather than standalone equipment demand. ABBN is more likely to monetize through drives, electrification and control-system content; this is lower headline revenue but potentially better-margin and less exposed to project execution. WRT1V is a niche beneficiary in marine and distributed-power applications, although its addressable opportunity is more dependent on fuel spreads and shipping-cycle capex than broad industrial decarbonization spending.

The underappreciated second-order beneficiary may be cement modernization rather than equipment OEMs: lower fuel intensity can protect EBITDA for HEI, HOLN and CRH where carbon costs and energy inputs remain elevated. Conversely, an industrial slowdown or lower European natural-gas prices weakens retrofit paybacks and makes discretionary efficiency capex among the first budgets deferred. Over 1-3 months, watch order commentary and industrial capex guidance; over 6-18 months, the catalyst is a measurable increase in retrofit awards in Asia and European carbon-compliance spending.

Consensus should not capitalize the full market-growth rate into the diversified OEMs. Waste-heat recovery remains fragmented and project-specific, while China-based suppliers can pressure equipment pricing. The thesis is falsified if GEV/ENR report expanding thermal-equipment backlog without corresponding margin or cash-conversion improvement, or if European gas prices fall sufficiently to lengthen customer retrofit paybacks.

AllMind Terminal

AI-powered research, real-time alerts, and portfolio analytics for institutional investors.

Request Trial

Market Sentiment

Overall Sentiment

moderately positive

Sentiment Score

0.42

Ticker Sentiment

ABBN0.35
GEV0.50
WRT1V0.20

Key Decisions for Investors

  • No immediate directional trade solely on this release; set alerts for GEV and ENR quarterly disclosures showing identifiable industrial heat-recovery/HRSG order growth and book-to-bill above 1.0x. Upgrade only if management quantifies backlog and margin accretion.
  • Prefer a 6-12 month long ABBN / short ENR relative position if industrial efficiency capex accelerates: ABBN should capture higher-margin controls and electrification content with lower fixed-price project risk. Exit if ABBN process-automation orders decelerate or ENR demonstrates superior cash conversion from its gas-services backlog.
  • Watch long WRT1V on a 3-9 month horizon only after marine order intake confirms waste-heat recovery adoption; use a tight risk limit around a material deterioration in marine equipment orders, since fuel-price weakness can rapidly impair retrofit economics.
  • For carbon- and energy-cost pressure, evaluate HEI or HOLN as indirect 12-18 month beneficiaries of kiln retrofits rather than chasing OEM valuation expansion. Require evidence that retrofit capex reduces fuel cost per tonne without offsetting volume weakness or maintenance downtime.

More News

From AllMind Research

Browse all research