Q1 2026 Backblaze Inc Earnings Call
Operator 2: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. My name is Abby, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Backblaze Q1 2026 Earnings Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press star followed by the number 1 on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, press star 1 again. Thank you. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mimi Kong, Head of Investor Relations. You may begin.
Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. My name is Abby, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Backblaze Q1 2026 Earnings Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press star followed by the number 1 on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, press star 1 again. Thank you. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mimi Kong, Head of Investor Relations. You may begin.
Speaker #1: All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press star followed by the number 1 on your telephone keypad.
Speaker #1: If you would like to withdraw your question, press star 1 again. Thank you. And I would now like to turn the conference over to Mimi Kong, Head of Investor Relations.
Speaker #1: You may begin. Thank you. Good afternoon, and welcome to Backblaze's First Quarter 2026 earnings call. On the call with me today are Gleb Budman, co-founder, CEO, and chairperson of the board, and Marc Suidan, Chief Financial Officer.
Mimi Kong: Thank you. Good afternoon, and welcome to Backblaze's first quarter 2026 earnings call. On the call with me today are Gleb Budman, Co-founder, CEO, and Chairperson of the Board, and Marc Suidan, Chief Financial Officer. Today, Backblaze will discuss the financial results that were distributed earlier. Statements on this call include forward-looking statements about our future financial results, the impact of our go-to-market transformation, sales and marketing initiatives, cost saving initiatives, results from new features, the impact of price changes, our ability to compete effectively and manage our growth, and our strategy to acquire new customers, retain and expand our business with existing customers. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially, including those described in our risk factors that are included in our most recent quarterly report on Form 10-Q and our other financial filings.
Mimi Kong: Thank you. Good afternoon, and welcome to Backblaze's first quarter 2026 earnings call. On the call with me today are Gleb Budman, Co-founder, CEO, and Chairperson of the Board, and Marc Suidan, Chief Financial Officer. Today, Backblaze will discuss the financial results that were distributed earlier. Statements on this call include forward-looking statements about our future financial results, the impact of our go-to-market transformation, sales and marketing initiatives, cost saving initiatives, results from new features, the impact of price changes, our ability to compete effectively and manage our growth, and our strategy to acquire new customers, retain and expand our business with existing customers.
Speaker #1: Today, Backblaze will discuss the financial results that were distributed earlier. Statements on this call include forward-looking statements about our future financial results, the impact of our go-to-market transformation, sales and marketing initiatives, cost-saving initiatives, results from new features, the impact of price changes, our ability to compete effectively and manage our growth, and our strategy to acquire new customers, retain and expand our business with existing customers.
Speaker #1: These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially, including those described in our risk factors that are included in our most recent quarterly report on Form 10-Q and our other financial filings.
Mimi Kong: These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially, including those described in our risk factors that are included in our most recent quarterly report on Form 10-Q and our other financial filings.
Speaker #1: You should not rely on our forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. All forward-looking statements that we make on this call are based on assumptions and beliefs as of today, and we undertake no obligation to update them except as required by law.
Mimi Kong: You should not rely on our forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. All forward-looking statements that we make on this call are based on assumptions and beliefs as of today, and we undertake no obligation to update them except as required by law. Our discussion today will include non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP measures should be considered in addition to and not as a substitute for our GAAP results. Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP results may be found in our earnings release, which was furnished with our Form 8-K filed today with the SEC. You can also find a slide presentation related to our comments in the webcast, which will also be posted on our investor relations page after the call. Please also see our press release or presentation for definitions of additional metrics such as NRR, gross customer retention rates, and adjusted free cash flows.
Mimi Kong: You should not rely on our forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. All forward-looking statements that we make on this call are based on assumptions and beliefs as of today, and we undertake no obligation to update them except as required by law. Our discussion today will include non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP measures should be considered in addition to and not as a substitute for our GAAP results. Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP results may be found in our earnings release, which was furnished with our Form 8-K filed today with the SEC.
Speaker #1: Our discussion today will include non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP measures should be considered in addition to and not as a substitute for our GAAP results.
Speaker #1: Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP results may be found in our earnings release, which was furnished with our Form 8K filed today with the SEC.
Speaker #1: You can also find a slide presentation related to our comments in the webcast, which will also be posted on our Investor Relations page after the call.
Mimi Kong: You can also find a slide presentation related to our comments in the webcast, which will also be posted on our investor relations page after the call. Please also see our press release or presentation for definitions of additional metrics such as NRR, gross customer retention rates, and adjusted free cash flows. We will be participating in the Needham Technology, Media, and Consumer Conference on 12 May in New York. I hope to see many of you there. Thank you for joining us, and I will now like to turn the call over to Gleb.
Speaker #1: Please also see our press release or presentation for definitions of additional metrics such as NRR, gross customer retention rate, and adjusted free cash flows.
Speaker #1: We will be participating in the Needham Technology Media and Consumer Conference on May 12th in New York. I hope to see many of you there.
Mimi Kong: We will be participating in the Needham Technology, Media, and Consumer Conference on 12 May in New York. I hope to see many of you there. Thank you for joining us, and I will now like to turn the call over to Gleb.
Speaker #1: Thank you for joining us, and I will now like to turn the call over to Gleb.
Speaker #2: Thank you, Mimi, and thank you, everyone, for joining us today. Q1 was a strong quarter. We beat revenue and adjusted EBITDA guidance, ending the quarter with 38.7 million in revenue, a 12% year-over-year with B2 growing 24%.
Gleb Budman: Thank you, Mimi, and thank you everyone for joining us today. Q1 was a strong quarter. We beat revenue and adjusted EBITDA guidance, ending the quarter with $38.7 million in revenue, a 12% year-over-year, with B2 growing 24%. We more than doubled our average sales deal size and drove 72% year-over-year growth in our 50K+ ARR cohort as we continue to move upmarket and are on track for our first full year of free cash flow positivity as a public company. What excites me most about Q1 goes beyond the numbers. AI is making storage increasingly important, and our organization is gelling and executing better than ever to capture that opportunity.
Gleb Budman: Thank you, Mimi, and thank you everyone for joining us today. Q1 was a strong quarter. We beat revenue and adjusted EBITDA guidance, ending the quarter with $38.7 million in revenue, a 12% year-over-year, with B2 growing 24%. We more than doubled our average sales deal size and drove 72% year-over-year growth in our 50K+ ARR cohort as we continue to move upmarket and are on track for our first full year of free cash flow positivity as a public company. What excites me most about Q1 goes beyond the numbers. AI is making storage increasingly important, and our organization is gelling and executing better than ever to capture that opportunity.
Speaker #2: We more than doubled our average sales deal size and drove 72% year-over-year growth in our 50K plus ARR cohort, as we continue to move up market in our on-track for our first full year of free cash flow positivity as a public company.
Speaker #2: What excites me most about Q1 goes beyond the numbers. AI is making storage increasingly important, and our organization is gelling and executing better than ever to capture that opportunity.
Speaker #2: This is evidenced by more than one-third of all new bookings coming from AI and the number of AI customers using our platform growing by 76% year-over-year.
Gleb Budman: This is evidenced by more than 1/3 of all new bookings coming from AI and the number of AI customers using our platform growing by 76% year over year. We entered 2026 saying we would build a more scalable, more predictable growth engine that serves the AI opportunity. Q1 started to show what that looks like. In AI, we are seeing demand from 2 parts of the market. One is companies building the infrastructure and tools that enable AI. The other is companies using that infrastructure to bring AI into products and workflows. We are winning in both. On the infrastructure side, there is a major replatforming happening in the market. For the first time in about 2 decades, the traditional hyperscalers are not the only place companies are building. They are also building on the Neoclouds.
Gleb Budman: This is evidenced by more than 1/3 of all new bookings coming from AI and the number of AI customers using our platform growing by 76% year over year. We entered 2026 saying we would build a more scalable, more predictable growth engine that serves the AI opportunity. Q1 started to show what that looks like. In AI, we are seeing demand from 2 parts of the market. One is companies building the infrastructure and tools that enable AI. The other is companies using that infrastructure to bring AI into products and workflows. We are winning in both.
Speaker #2: We entered 2026 saying we would build a more scalable, more predictable growth engine that serves the AI opportunity. Q1 started to show what that looks like.
Speaker #2: In AI, we are seeing demand from two parts of the market. One is companies building the infrastructure and tools that enable AI. The other is companies using that infrastructure to bring AI into products and workflows.
Speaker #2: We are winning in both. On the infrastructure side, there is a major replatforming happening in the market. For the first time in about two decades, the traditional hyperscalers are not the only place companies are building.
Gleb Budman: On the infrastructure side, there is a major replatforming happening in the market. For the first time in about 2 decades, the traditional hyperscalers are not the only place companies are building. They are also building on the Neoclouds. Synergy Research estimates that the Neocloud market was $25 billion in 2025 and growing to about $400 billion by 2031. In order for these Neoclouds to support their customers' AI workflows, they need to offer cloud storage. Some Neoclouds have offered cloud storage built on Flash. It was fast, and it worked.
Speaker #2: They're also building on the neoclouds. Synergy Research estimates that the neocloud market with 25 billion in 2025 and growing to about 400 billion by 2031.
Gleb Budman: Synergy Research estimates that the Neocloud market was $25 billion in 2025 and growing to about $400 billion by 2031. In order for these Neoclouds to support their customers' AI workflows, they need to offer cloud storage. Some Neoclouds have offered cloud storage built on Flash. It was fast, and it worked. As these platforms have scaled and AI workloads have grown, the economics have become increasingly difficult. Flash is now about 10 times more expensive per terabyte than hard drives. It works well for use cases requiring the lowest latency for smaller data sizes but becomes unsustainable at exabyte scale. As a result, Neoclouds are now actively looking to introduce a cost-efficient hard drive tier time flash to manage both performance and economics across their infrastructure.
Speaker #2: In order for these neoclouds to support their customers' AI workflows, they need to offer cloud storage. Some neoclouds have offered cloud storage built on Flash.
Speaker #2: It was fast, and it worked. But as these platforms have scaled and AI workloads have grown, the economics have become increasingly difficult. Flash is now about 10 times more expensive per terabyte than hard drives.
Gleb Budman: As these platforms have scaled and AI workloads have grown, the economics have become increasingly difficult. Flash is now about 10 times more expensive per terabyte than hard drives. It works well for use cases requiring the lowest latency for smaller data sizes but becomes unsustainable at exabyte scale. As a result, Neoclouds are now actively looking to introduce a cost-efficient hard drive tier time flash to manage both performance and economics across their infrastructure.
Speaker #2: It works well for use cases requiring the lowest latency for smaller data sizes, but becomes unsustainable at exabyte scale. As a result, neoclouds are now actively looking to introduce a cost-efficient hard drive tier behind Flash to manage both performance and economics across their infrastructure.
Speaker #2: At Backblaze, we built an internet-scale file system to optimize performance per dollar out of hard drives. And thus believe Backblaze is ideally positioned to provide exactly what these neoclouds need.
Gleb Budman: At Backblaze, we built an internet-scale file system to optimize performance per dollar out of hard drives and thus believe Backblaze is ideally positioned to provide exactly what these NeoClouds need. We've seen support for that belief not only from the multiple signed NeoClouds where we provide this for them already, but also the active engagement we're having with many of the top NeoClouds. We estimate our opportunity to support NeoClouds at $14 billion by 2030, and with the success we're seeing, we are aligning resources internally behind that opportunity. In addition to NeoClouds, we're seeing a significant opportunity for us supporting other AI infrastructure.
Gleb Budman: At Backblaze, we built an internet-scale file system to optimize performance per dollar out of hard drives and thus believe Backblaze is ideally positioned to provide exactly what these NeoClouds need. We've seen support for that belief not only from the multiple signed NeoClouds where we provide this for them already, but also the active engagement we're having with many of the top NeoClouds. We estimate our opportunity to support NeoClouds at $14 billion by 2030, and with the success we're seeing, we are aligning resources internally behind that opportunity. In addition to NeoClouds, we're seeing a significant opportunity for us supporting other AI infrastructure.
Speaker #2: We've seen support for that belief not only from the multiple signed neoclouds where we provide this for them already, but also the active engagement we're having with many of the top neoclouds.
Speaker #2: We estimate our opportunity to support neoclouds at 14 billion by 2030 and with the success we're seeing, we are aligning resources internally behind that opportunity.
Speaker #2: In addition to neoclouds, we're seeing a significant opportunity for us supporting other AI infrastructure. For example, we are also seeing strong demand from companies supplying large data sets into the AI ecosystem because they need a place to store large data sets efficiently but also be able to move them where they need to go rapidly.
Gleb Budman: For example, we are also seeing strong demand from companies supplying large data sets into the AI ecosystem because they need a place to store large data sets efficiently but also be able to move them where they need to go rapidly. One recent example is a training data provider serving AI use cases that selected B2 to store large volumes of video data. A hypergrowth company, it was experiencing rate limits and bandwidth constraints with its existing provider and needed a solution that could scale quickly. Backblaze won on both economics and technical fit. The deal closed in just 11 days at nearly $1 million of ARR, underscoring how quickly these companies move when infrastructure becomes a constraint and how well Backblaze is suited to the infrastructure side of the AI opportunity.
Gleb Budman: For example, we are also seeing strong demand from companies supplying large data sets into the AI ecosystem because they need a place to store large data sets efficiently but also be able to move them where they need to go rapidly. One recent example is a training data provider serving AI use cases that selected B2 to store large volumes of video data. A hypergrowth company, it was experiencing rate limits and bandwidth constraints with its existing provider and needed a solution that could scale quickly.
Speaker #2: One recent example is a training data provider serving AI use cases that selected B2 to store large volumes of video data. A hyper-growth company it was experiencing rate limits and bandwidth constraints with its existing provider and needed a solution that could scale quickly.
Speaker #2: Backblaze won on both economics and technical fit. The deal closed in just 11 days at nearly $1 million of ARR, underscoring how quickly these companies move when infrastructure becomes a constraint and how well Backblaze is suited to the infrastructure side of the AI opportunity.
Gleb Budman: Backblaze won on both economics and technical fit. The deal closed in just 11 days at nearly $1 million of ARR, underscoring how quickly these companies move when infrastructure becomes a constraint and how well Backblaze is suited to the infrastructure side of the AI opportunity.
Speaker #2: The other part of the AI market we're seeing is companies using infrastructure like ours to bring AI into their products. As AI models move from text to multimodal, incorporating video, audio, and images, the volume of data required to train and run those models grows by orders of magnitude.
Gleb Budman: The other part of the AI market we're seeing is companies using infrastructure like ours to bring AI into their products. As AI models move from text to multimodal, incorporating video, audio, and images, the volume of data required to train and run those models grows by orders of magnitude. This is not a future trend. It's happening now, and it's creating significant and growing need for storage that can handle it economically and at scale. With the generative AI customers we have today, we are finding that price and performance get us in the door, but it is the experience that keeps them and grows them. Transparent pricing, responsive support, and a team that works with them rather than just selling to them. These customers are scaling fast, and they do not have time to manage infrastructure problems. With Backblaze, they don't have to.
Gleb Budman: The other part of the AI market we're seeing is companies using infrastructure like ours to bring AI into their products. As AI models move from text to multimodal, incorporating video, audio, and images, the volume of data required to train and run those models grows by orders of magnitude. This is not a future trend. It's happening now, and it's creating significant and growing need for storage that can handle it economically and at scale. With the generative AI customers we have today, we are finding that price and performance get us in the door, but it is the experience that keeps them and grows them.
Speaker #2: This is not a future trend. It's happening now, and it's creating significant and growing need for storage that can handle it economically and at scale.
Speaker #2: With the generative AI customers we have today, we are finding that price and performance get us in the door. But it is the experience that keeps them and grows them.
Gleb Budman: Transparent pricing, responsive support, and a team that works with them rather than just selling to them. These customers are scaling fast, and they do not have time to manage infrastructure problems. With Backblaze, they don't have to.
Speaker #2: Transparent pricing, responsive support, and a team that works with them rather than just selling to them. These customers are scaling fast, and they do not have time to manage infrastructure problems.
Speaker #2: With Backblaze, they don't have to. A good example from Q1 is an AI-powered video creation company that selected B2 to store data used to train its models.
Gleb Budman: A good example from Q1 is an AI-powered video creation company that selected B2 to store data used to train its models. The customer had been running into cost and performance issues with its existing provider. The platform was difficult to manage and the economics were not working at its scale. Backblaze offered the best performance per dollar and a platform that was easy to use and easy to scale. The initial deployment represents nearly half a million dollars of ARR and creates a clear path to expand into higher performance workloads over time. These customer wins are just examples of where we won in Q1 and are reflective of opportunities we have in pipeline going forward.
Gleb Budman: A good example from Q1 is an AI-powered video creation company that selected B2 to store data used to train its models. The customer had been running into cost and performance issues with its existing provider. The platform was difficult to manage and the economics were not working at its scale. Backblaze offered the best performance per dollar and a platform that was easy to use and easy to scale. The initial deployment represents nearly half a million dollars of ARR and creates a clear path to expand into higher performance workloads over time. These customer wins are just examples of where we won in Q1 and are reflective of opportunities we have in pipeline going forward.
Speaker #2: The customer had been running into cost and performance issues, with its existing provider the platform was difficult to manage and the economics were not working at its scale.
Speaker #2: Backblaze offered the best performance per dollar and a platform that was easy to use and easy to scale. The initial deployment represents nearly half a million dollars of ARR and creates a clear path to expand into higher performance workloads over time.
Speaker #2: These customer wins are just examples of where we won in Q1 and are reflective of opportunities we have in the pipeline going forward. It's clear that, whether customers are building AI infrastructure or using AI in their products, they are scaling fast, the data is growing exponentially, and they need infrastructure that is performant, open, and cost-efficient at scale.
Gleb Budman: It's clear that whether customers are building AI infrastructure or using AI in their products, they are scaling fast, that data is growing exponentially, and they need infrastructure that is performant, open, and cost-efficient at scale. That is the moat we have spent 19 years building, and AI is making it more valuable, not less. To be the leading storage platform for AI, we are also meeting developers where they already work. We're embedding Backblaze into the AI ecosystem by integrating directly into the tools developers already use. For Hugging Face, which has 13 million users and over 2 million models, we ship the tool that lets teams store and share model caches on B2. For ComfyUI, which recently raised at a $500 million valuation, we built a plugin to support generative AI workflows.
Gleb Budman: It's clear that whether customers are building AI infrastructure or using AI in their products, they are scaling fast, that data is growing exponentially, and they need infrastructure that is performant, open, and cost-efficient at scale. That is the moat we have spent 19 years building, and AI is making it more valuable, not less.
Speaker #2: That is the moat we have spent 19 years building an AI is making it more valuable, not less. To be the leading storage platform for AI, we are also meeting developers where they already work.
Gleb Budman: To be the leading storage platform for AI, we are also meeting developers where they already work. We're embedding Backblaze into the AI ecosystem by integrating directly into the tools developers already use. For Hugging Face, which has 13 million users and over 2 million models, we ship the tool that lets teams store and share model caches on B2. For ComfyUI, which recently raised at a $500 million valuation, we built a plugin to support generative AI workflows.
Speaker #2: We are embedding Backblaze into the AI ecosystem by integrating directly into the tools developers already use. For hugging face, which has 13 million users and over 2 million models, we ship the tool that lets teams store and share model caches on B2.
Speaker #2: For ComfyUI, which recently raised at a $500 million valuation to support generative AI workflows. For CVAT, which is used by tens of thousands of computer vision teams, B2 is now integrated as a backend for training data.
Gleb Budman: For CVAT, which is used by tens of thousands of computer vision teams, B2 is now integrated as a backend for training data. For MLflow, the most downloaded tool for taking AI projects from lab to production with 60 million monthly downloads, B2 has now been added as an integrated artifact store. The AI opportunity is making what we do increasingly critical. A year ago, we began a meaningful transformation of our go-to-market organization focused on 3 things: increasing awareness, driving greater pipeline consistency, and expanding revenue within our installed base. In Q1, we delivered progress on all 3. On awareness, the Flamethrower startup program is gaining real traction. We have now welcomed approximately 100 companies in under 3 months, half the time it would typically take.
Gleb Budman: For CVAT, which is used by tens of thousands of computer vision teams, B2 is now integrated as a backend for training data. For MLflow, the most downloaded tool for taking AI projects from lab to production with 60 million monthly downloads, B2 has now been added as an integrated artifact store. The AI opportunity is making what we do increasingly critical. A year ago, we began a meaningful transformation of our go-to-market organization focused on 3 things: increasing awareness, driving greater pipeline consistency, and expanding revenue within our installed base. In Q1, we delivered progress on all 3. On awareness, the Flamethrower startup program is gaining real traction. We have now welcomed approximately 100 companies in under 3 months, half the time it would typically take.
Speaker #2: And for MLflow, the most downloaded tool for taking AI projects from lab to production, with 60 million monthly downloads, B2 has now been added as an integrated artifact store.
Speaker #2: So the AI opportunity is making what we do increasingly critical. We're also stepping up to meet it. A year ago, we began a meaningful transformation of our go-to-market organization focused on three things: increasing awareness, driving greater pipeline consistency, and expanding revenue within our installed base.
Speaker #2: In Q1, we delivered progress on all three. On awareness, the flamethrower startup program is gaining real traction. We have now welcomed approximately 100 companies in under three months, half the time it would typically take.
Speaker #2: We've been added to the A16Z founder resource program, the launch startup showcase, and the startup growing conference, all of which expand our reach with venture-backed startups.
Gleb Budman: We've been added to the a16z Founder Resource Program, the Launch Startup Showcase, and the Startup Grind Conference, all of which expand our reach with venture-backed startups. On pipeline consistency, we have completed our core go-to-market systems upgrade, giving our team better visibility and a stronger foundation for a faster, more disciplined revenue motion. Within our installed base, pipeline sourced from existing customers has nearly doubled year over year, reflecting our growing ability to land and expand with our customers. To accelerate this next phase, we welcomed Anuj Kumar as our Chief Revenue Officer. Anuj has scaled go-to-market for cloud infrastructure and enterprise storage at NetApp, VMware, Red Hat, and SUSE. He brings a pipeline discipline and execution rigor this phase of our growth requires, and we believe his leadership will be a meaningful complement to the upmarket momentum we have already built.
Gleb Budman: We've been added to the a16z Founder Resource Program, the Launch Startup Showcase, and the Startup Grind Conference, all of which expand our reach with venture-backed startups. On pipeline consistency, we have completed our core go-to-market systems upgrade, giving our team better visibility and a stronger foundation for a faster, more disciplined revenue motion. Within our installed base, pipeline sourced from existing customers has nearly doubled year over year, reflecting our growing ability to land and expand with our customers.
Speaker #2: On pipeline consistency, we have completed our core go-to-market systems upgrade. Giving our team better visibility and a stronger foundation for a faster, more disciplined revenue motion.
Speaker #2: And within our installed base, pipeline sourced from existing customers has nearly doubled year over year, reflecting our growing ability to land and expand with our customers.
Speaker #2: To accelerate this next phase, we welcomed Anush Kumar as our chief revenue officer. Anush has scaled go-to-market for cloud infrastructure and enterprise storage at NetApp, VMware, Red Hat, and SUSE.
Gleb Budman: To accelerate this next phase, we welcomed Anuj Kumar as our Chief Revenue Officer. Anuj has scaled go-to-market for cloud infrastructure and enterprise storage at NetApp, VMware, Red Hat, and SUSE. He brings a pipeline discipline and execution rigor this phase of our growth requires, and we believe his leadership will be a meaningful complement to the upmarket momentum we have already built.
Speaker #2: He brings a pipeline discipline and execution rigor this phase of our growth requires. And we believe his leadership will be a meaningful complement to the up-market momentum we have already built.
Speaker #2: We also saw encouraging new customer momentum during the quarter across a range of data-intensive use cases. That included a healthcare data company who selected us for disaster recovery a cloud gaming platform that chose B2 to store video across multi-cloud environments.
Gleb Budman: We also saw encouraging new customer momentum during the quarter across a range of data-intensive use cases. That included a healthcare data company who selected us for disaster recovery, a cloud gaming platform that chose B2 to store video across multi-cloud environments, and an audio streaming platform migrating from self-managed infrastructure to B2. These wins reinforce a broader point. Backblaze is winning where data is valuable, active, and operationally important. This is why I am excited about the opportunity ahead. The shift to multimodal AI is driving exponential data growth, and the need for high performance, yet cost-efficient storage has never been greater. The customers who are choosing Backblaze are exactly the kinds of customers that compound with us over time. We are stepping up to this opportunity with an up-leveled team, a go-to-market transformation well underway, and a platform we have spent nearly two decades building and optimizing.
Gleb Budman: We also saw encouraging new customer momentum during the quarter across a range of data-intensive use cases. That included a healthcare data company who selected us for disaster recovery, a cloud gaming platform that chose B2 to store video across multi-cloud environments, and an audio streaming platform migrating from self-managed infrastructure to B2. These wins reinforce a broader point. Backblaze is winning where data is valuable, active, and operationally important. This is why I am excited about the opportunity ahead.
Speaker #2: And an audio streaming platform migrating from self-managed infrastructure to B2. These wins reinforce a broader point: Backblaze is winning where data is valuable, active, and operationally important.
Speaker #2: And this is why I am excited about the opportunity ahead. The shift to multimodal AI is driving exponential data growth, and the need for high-performance, yet cost-efficient, storage has never been greater.
Gleb Budman: The shift to multimodal AI is driving exponential data growth, and the need for high performance, yet cost-efficient storage has never been greater. The customers who are choosing Backblaze are exactly the kinds of customers that compound with us over time. We are stepping up to this opportunity with an up-leveled team, a go-to-market transformation well underway, and a platform we have spent nearly two decades building and optimizing. AI is making everything we have built more valuable, and we are becoming the storage infrastructure that powers the AI economy. With that, I will turn it over to Marc.
Speaker #2: The customers who are choosing Backblaze are exactly the kinds of customers that compound with us over time. We are stepping up to this opportunity with an up-level team of go-to-market transformation well underway and a platform we have spent nearly two decades building and optimizing.
Speaker #2: AI is making everything we have built more valuable, and we are becoming the storage infrastructure that powers the AI economy. With that, I'll turn it over to Marc.
Gleb Budman: AI is making everything we have built more valuable, and we are becoming the storage infrastructure that powers the AI economy. With that, I will turn it over to Marc.
Speaker #1: Thank you, Gleb and good afternoon, everybody. Our first quarter results reflect the strategy that we have been executing against. We exceeded the top end of both revenue and adjusted EBITDA guidance.
Marc Suidan: Thank you, Gleb, and good afternoon, everybody. Our Q1 results reflect the strategy that we have been executing against. We exceeded the top end of both revenue and adjusted EBITDA guidance. The Q1 outperformance reflects stronger sales execution, and the EBITDA beat demonstrates the operating leverage in the model. Let me walk through the quarter and then cover our outlook. We finished Q1 with revenue of $38.7 million, above the high end of our guidance of $38 million. The beat was broad-based across both B2 Cloud Storage and Computer Backup, with B2 remaining the primary growth driver. B2 Cloud Storage grew 24% year over year to $22.4 million, and ARR grew 28% year over year, reflecting the underlying strength and momentum of the business.
Marc Suidan: Thank you, Gleb, and good afternoon, everybody. Our Q1 results reflect the strategy that we have been executing against. We exceeded the top end of both revenue and adjusted EBITDA guidance. The Q1 outperformance reflects stronger sales execution, and the EBITDA beat demonstrates the operating leverage in the model. Let me walk through the quarter and then cover our outlook.
Speaker #1: Our Q1 outperformance reflects stronger sales execution, and the EBITDA beat demonstrates the operating leverage in the model. Let me walk through the quarter and then cover our outlook.
Speaker #1: We finished Q1 with revenue of 38.7 million dollars, above the high end of our guidance of 38 million. The beat was broad-based across both B2 cloud storage and computer backup, with B2 remaining the primary growth driver.
Marc Suidan: We finished Q1 with revenue of $38.7 million, above the high end of our guidance of $38 million. The beat was broad-based across both B2 Cloud Storage and Computer Backup, with B2 remaining the primary growth driver. B2 Cloud Storage grew 24% year over year to $22.4 million, and ARR grew 28% year over year, reflecting the underlying strength and momentum of the business.
Speaker #1: B2 cloud storage grew 24% year over year to 22.4 million. And AR grew 28% year over year, reflecting the underlying strength and momentum of the business.
Speaker #1: The Q1 revenue outperformance was driven by higher customer data consumption on the B2 Cloud Platform, and computer backup coming in slightly more favorable than our forecasted decline.
Marc Suidan: The Q1 revenue outperformance was driven by higher customer data consumption on the B2 Cloud Storage and Computer Backup coming in slightly more favorable than our forecasted decline. On bookings, which primarily affect revenue in future quarters, we closed multiple large deals for a strong quarter. We made several updates this quarter to improve the calculations of our ARR and RPO metrics. I will briefly walk through those changes as I cover the results. ARR increased by more than $5 million sequentially to $158 million, with B2 growing 28% year-over-year. This quarter, we updated our ARR methodology to improve comparability across periods, and the change is defined in the earnings presentation posted on our investor relations website. Under both the new and previous methods, the sequential ARR improvement is approximately $5 million.
Marc Suidan: The Q1 revenue outperformance was driven by higher customer data consumption on the B2 Cloud Storage and Computer Backup coming in slightly more favorable than our forecasted decline. On bookings, which primarily affect revenue in future quarters, we closed multiple large deals for a strong quarter. We made several updates this quarter to improve the calculations of our ARR and RPO metrics. I will briefly walk through those changes as I cover the results. ARR increased by more than $5 million sequentially to $158 million, with B2 growing 28% year-over-year.
Speaker #1: On bookings, which primarily affect revenue in future quarters, we closed multiple large deals for a strong quarter. We made several updates this quarter to improve the calculations of our ARR and RPO metrics.
Speaker #1: I will briefly walk through those changes as I cover the results. ARR increased by more than 5 million dollars sequentially to 158 million dollars, with B2 growing 28% year over year.
Speaker #1: This quarter, we updated our ARR methodology to improve comparability across periods and the changes defined in the earnings presentation posted on our investor relations website.
Marc Suidan: This quarter, we updated our ARR methodology to improve comparability across periods, and the change is defined in the earnings presentation posted on our investor relations website. Under both the new and previous methods, the sequential ARR improvement is approximately $5 million.
Speaker #1: Under both the new and previous methods, the sequential ARR improvement is approximately $5 million. We ended the quarter with 187 customers contributing over $50,000 in ARR, up 51% from a year ago, reflecting continued strong progress up market.
Marc Suidan: We ended the quarter with 187 customers contributing over $50,000 in ARR, up 51% from a year ago, reflecting continued strong progress upmarket. We also updated our RPO methodology this quarter and described the change in our earnings presentation. The change is aligned to our peer group, and RPO is now a more important metric as we continue to move upmarket, signing both annual and multi-year customer commitments. Under the updated methodology, RPO increased by $6 million sequentially and by $31 million from the prior period. Our gross customer retention metrics remain very healthy, with customers continuing to use both our B2 and Computer Backup solutions for 9 years on average. Beginning this quarter, our reported net revenue retention reflects an in-quarter methodology, which we believe provides a more current view of our customer expansion and retention trends.
Marc Suidan: We ended the quarter with 187 customers contributing over $50,000 in ARR, up 51% from a year ago, reflecting continued strong progress upmarket. We also updated our RPO methodology this quarter and described the change in our earnings presentation. The change is aligned to our peer group, and RPO is now a more important metric as we continue to move upmarket, signing both annual and multi-year customer commitments.
Speaker #1: We also updated our RPO methodology this quarter and described the change in our earnings presentation. The change is aligned to our peer group in RPO is now a more important metric as we continue to move up market, signing both annual and multi-year customer commitments.
Speaker #1: Under the updated methodology, RPO increased by 6 million dollars sequentially and by 31 million dollars from the prior period. Our gross customer retention metrics remained very healthy, with customers continuing to use both our B2 and computer backup solutions for nine years on average.
Marc Suidan: Under the updated methodology, RPO increased by $6 million sequentially and by $31 million from the prior period. Our gross customer retention metrics remain very healthy, with customers continuing to use both our B2 and Computer Backup solutions for 9 years on average. Beginning this quarter, our reported net revenue retention reflects an in-quarter methodology, which we believe provides a more current view of our customer expansion and retention trends.
Speaker #1: Beginning this quarter, our reported net revenue retention reflects an in-quarter methodology which we believe provides a more current view of our customer expansion and retention trends.
Speaker #1: In B2, net revenue retention was 110%, up from 105% a year ago. Reflecting continued expansion within the customer base. As a consumption business, B2 benefits from both the organic customer data growth and the cross-sell, upsell sales motion.
Marc Suidan: In B2, net revenue retention was 110%, up from 105% a year ago, reflecting continued expansion within the customer base. As a consumption business, B2 benefits from both the organic customer data growth and the cross-sell/upsell sales motion. Q1 gross margin was 61% versus 56% in the prior year. The year-over-year improvement shows strong operating leverage continuing to kick in as we tightly manage costs and also from the extension of the useful life of our fixed assets. Total operating expenses were $29 million in Q1, roughly flat compared to Q4, and improved by approximately 600 basis points from the prior year as a percentage of revenue, reflecting strong operating leverage as we maintain our focus on cost management.
Marc Suidan: In B2, net revenue retention was 110%, up from 105% a year ago, reflecting continued expansion within the customer base. As a consumption business, B2 benefits from both the organic customer data growth and the cross-sell/upsell sales motion. Q1 gross margin was 61% versus 56% in the prior year.
Speaker #1: Q1 gross margin was 61%, versus 56% in the prior year. The year-over-year improvement shows strong operating leverage continuing to kick in as we tightly manage costs, and also from the extension of the useful life of our fixed assets.
Marc Suidan: The year-over-year improvement shows strong operating leverage continuing to kick in as we tightly manage costs and also from the extension of the useful life of our fixed assets. Total operating expenses were $29 million in Q1, roughly flat compared to Q4, and improved by approximately 600 basis points from the prior year as a percentage of revenue, reflecting strong operating leverage as we maintain our focus on cost management.
Speaker #1: Total operating expenses were 29 million dollars in Q1, roughly flat compared to Q4, and improved by approximately 600 basis points from the prior year as a percentage of revenue, reflecting strong operating leverage as we maintain our focus on cost management.
Speaker #1: Q1 adjusted EBITDA was 10 million dollars, or 26% of margin, up from 6 million dollars, or 18% in the prior year, reflecting strong operating leverage as revenue scales.
Marc Suidan: Q1 adjusted EBITDA was $10 million or a 26% of margin, up from $6 million or 18% in the prior year, reflecting strong operating leverage as revenue scales. Sequentially, margin declined modestly from 28% in Q4, primarily reflecting the one-time benefits we referenced in our last earnings call. Adjusted free cash flow was -$1.8 million in Q1, reflecting earlier payments in the quarter. We are also pulling forward a portion of 2027 CapEx into 2026 in response to strong demand signals. Even with that pull forward, we continue to expect adjusted free cash flow to be positive for the full year, with improvement weighted towards the H2 of the year. We have the capital in place to support the growth that we are seeing.
Marc Suidan: Q1 adjusted EBITDA was $10 million or a 26% of margin, up from $6 million or 18% in the prior year, reflecting strong operating leverage as revenue scales. Sequentially, margin declined modestly from 28% in Q4, primarily reflecting the one-time benefits we referenced in our last earnings call. Adjusted free cash flow was -$1.8 million in Q1, reflecting earlier payments in the quarter. We are also pulling forward a portion of 2027 CapEx into 2026 in response to strong demand signals. Even with that pull forward, we continue to expect adjusted free cash flow to be positive for the full year, with improvement weighted towards the H2 of the year. We have the capital in place to support the growth that we are seeing.
Speaker #1: Sequentially, margin decline modestly from 28% in Q4, primarily reflecting the one-time benefits we referenced in our last earnings call. Adjusted free cash flow was negative 1.8 million dollars in Q1, reflecting earlier payments in the quarter.
Speaker #1: We are also pulling forward a portion of 2027 CapEx into 2026 in response to strong demand signals. Even with that pull-forward, we continue to expect adjusted free cash flow to be positive for the full year, with improvement weighted towards the second half of the year.
Speaker #1: We have the capital in place to support the growth that we are seeing. We currently have more than $100 million in capital leasing capacity, with approximately half of that utilized.
Marc Suidan: We currently have more than $100 million in capital leasing capacity with approximately half of that utilized. Based on our current operating plan, we expect to fund growth through operating cash flow and capital leases. We do not anticipate the need to raise additional capital through follow-on equity offerings. In fact, we plan to continue to focus on reducing our dilution through our modest stock buyback and our next year settlements for RSU grants. Looking ahead, we introduce updated B2 pricing and packaging effective 1 May. The change reflects the investments that we have made in our platform performance, our effort to further simplify pricing by removing API transaction fees, and the rising cost of hardware and data centers. On a net basis, we expect the pricing update to be accretive to revenue and margins. That will be reflected in our guidance.
Marc Suidan: We currently have more than $100 million in capital leasing capacity with approximately half of that utilized. Based on our current operating plan, we expect to fund growth through operating cash flow and capital leases. We do not anticipate the need to raise additional capital through follow-on equity offerings. In fact, we plan to continue to focus on reducing our dilution through our modest stock buyback and our next year settlements for RSU grants. Looking ahead, we introduce updated B2 pricing and packaging effective 1 May.
Speaker #1: Based on our current operating plan, we expect to fund growth through operating cash flow and capital leases, and we do not anticipate the need to raise additional capital through follow-on equity offerings.
Speaker #1: In fact, we plan to continue to focus on reducing our dilution through our modest stock buyback in our next share settlements for RCU grants.
Speaker #1: Looking ahead, we introduce updated B2 pricing and packaging effective May 1. The change reflects the investments that we have made in our platform performance, our effort to further simplify pricing by removing API transaction fees, and the rising cost of hardware and data centers.
Marc Suidan: The change reflects the investments that we have made in our platform performance, our effort to further simplify pricing by removing API transaction fees, and the rising cost of hardware and data centers. On a net basis, we expect the pricing update to be accretive to revenue and margins. That will be reflected in our guidance.
Speaker #1: On a net basis, we expect the pricing update to be accretive to revenue and margins and that will be reflected in our guidance. So moving on to our guidance.
Marc Suidan: Moving on to our guidance. For Q2, we expect revenue to be in the range of $39.8 million to 40.2 million. On our last earnings call, we said B2 growth in Q2 would be 12%. Based on this new midpoint, the B2 growth in Q2 will be closer to 20%, which is a big improvement. The Q2 outlook includes a partial quarter benefit from the May 1 pricing update, along with variable usage from customers that we have already actualized in April. We are not assuming the same level of variable usage in H2. Adjusted EBITDA margin is expected to be in the range of 21% to 23% for Q2. The sequential step down from Q1 reflects the timing of investments as we continue to build for growth.
Marc Suidan: Moving on to our guidance. For Q2, we expect revenue to be in the range of $39.8 million to 40.2 million. On our last earnings call, we said B2 growth in Q2 would be 12%. Based on this new midpoint, the B2 growth in Q2 will be closer to 20%, which is a big improvement. The Q2 outlook includes a partial quarter benefit from the May 1 pricing update, along with variable usage from customers that we have already actualized in April. We are not assuming the same level of variable usage in H2. Adjusted EBITDA margin is expected to be in the range of 21% to 23% for Q2. The sequential step down from Q1 reflects the timing of investments as we continue to build for growth.
Speaker #1: For the second quarter, we expect revenue to be in the range of 39.8 million to 40.2 million dollars. On our last earnings call, we said B2 growth in the second quarter would be 12%.
Speaker #1: Based on this new midpoint, the B2 growth in Q2 will be closer to 20%, which is a big improvement. The Q2 outlook includes a partial quarter benefit from the May 1 pricing update, along with variable usage from customers that we have already actualized in April.
Speaker #1: We are not assuming the same level of variable usage in the second half of the year. Adjusted EBITDA margin is expected to be in the range of 21 to 23 percent for Q2.
Speaker #1: The sequential step down from Q1 reflects the timing of investments as we continue to build for growth. Turning to the full year, we are raising our full-year revenue guidance to 161.5 million to 163.5 million up 5 million dollars from our prior midpoint of 157.5 million.
Marc Suidan: Turning to the full-year, we are raising our full-year revenue guidance to $161.5 million to $163.5 million, up $5 million from our prior midpoint of $157.5 million. That increase reflects two factors: stronger first quarter performance impacting the rest of 2026, and the benefit of the new B2 pricing and offering. Each contributes to approximately half of the raise. We are also raising our full-year adjusted EBITDA margin guidance by 400 basis points to a range of 23% to 25%, up from 19% to 21% previously. As a reminder, our guidance philosophy excludes individual deals greater than $500,000, high variable usage above contracted minimums, and incremental upside from our go-to-market transformation.
Marc Suidan: Turning to the full-year, we are raising our full-year revenue guidance to $161.5 million to $163.5 million, up $5 million from our prior midpoint of $157.5 million. That increase reflects two factors: stronger first quarter performance impacting the rest of 2026, and the benefit of the new B2 pricing and offering. Each contributes to approximately half of the raise. We are also raising our full-year adjusted EBITDA margin guidance by 400 basis points to a range of 23% to 25%, up from 19% to 21% previously. As a reminder, our guidance philosophy excludes individual deals greater than $500,000, high variable usage above contracted minimums, and incremental upside from our go-to-market transformation.
Speaker #1: That increase reflects two factors. Stronger first-quarter performance impacting the rest of 2026 and the benefit of the new B2 pricing and offering. Each contributes to approximately half of the raise.
Speaker #1: We are also raising our full-year adjusted EBITDA margin guidance by 400 basis points, to a range of 23 to 25 percent, up from 19 to 21 percent previously.
Speaker #1: As a reminder, our guidance philosophy excludes individual deals greater than $500,000, high variable usage above contracted minimums, and incremental upside from our go-to-market transformation.
Speaker #1: As these elements become more predictable and repeatable, we will incorporate them into our forward guide and communicate that transition clearly. In summary, Q1 was a strong quarter across the board.
Marc Suidan: As these elements become more predictable and repeatable, we will incorporate them into our forward guide and communicate that transition clearly. In summary, Q1 was a strong quarter across the board. Revenue beat, adjusted EBITDA beat, B2 growth accelerating, and bookings improving. We remain focused on executing on our AI opportunity by driving forward our go-to-market transformation and scaling our B2 business. We look forward to your questions. With that, operator, please open up the line.
Marc Suidan: As these elements become more predictable and repeatable, we will incorporate them into our forward guide and communicate that transition clearly. In summary, Q1 was a strong quarter across the board. Revenue beat, adjusted EBITDA beat, B2 growth accelerating, and bookings improving. We remain focused on executing on our AI opportunity by driving forward our go-to-market transformation and scaling our B2 business. We look forward to your questions. With that, operator, please open up the line.
Speaker #1: Revenue beat, adjusted EBITDA beat, B2 growth accelerating, and bookings improving. We remain focused on executing on our AI opportunity by driving forward our go-to-market transformation and scaling our B2 business.
Speaker #1: We look forward to your questions. With that operator, please open up the line.
Operator 2: Thank you. We'll now begin the question-and-answer session. If you have dialed in and would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad to raise your hand and join the queue. If you would like to withdraw your question, simply press star 1 again. If you're called upon to ask your question and are listening via speakerphone on your device, please pick up your handset and ensure that your phone is not on mute when asking your question. To be able to take as many questions as possible, we ask that you please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. Again, it is star 1 to join the queue. Our first question comes from the line of Mike Cikos with Needham. Your line is open.
Operator: Thank you. We'll now begin the question-and-answer session. If you have dialed in and would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad to raise your hand and join the queue. If you would like to withdraw your question, simply press star 1 again. If you're called upon to ask your question and are listening via speakerphone on your device, please pick up your handset and ensure that your phone is not on mute when asking your question. To be able to take as many questions as possible, we ask that you please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. Again, it is star 1 to join the queue. Our first question comes from the line of Mike Cikos with Needham. Your line is open.
Speaker #2: Thank you, and we'll now begin the question and answer session. If you have dialed in and would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad or raise your hand and join the queue.
Speaker #2: If you would like to withdraw your question, simply press star one again. If you're called upon to ask your question on our listening via speakerphone on your device, please pick up your handset and ensure that your phone is not on mute when asking your question.
Speaker #2: To be able to take as many questions as possible, we ask that you please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. Again, it is star one to join the queue.
Speaker #2: And our first question comes from the line of Mike Sicos with Needham. Your line is open.
Speaker #3: Hey, guys. Thanks for taking the question here. Congratulations on the strong start to calendar '26. First question, I guess, is more for Gleb. But I just wanted to get more on the success that you guys are seeing with the AI customers following the go-to-market transformation initiatives we've put in place.
Mike Cikos: Hey, guys. Thanks for taking the question here. Congratulations on the strong start to calendar 2026. First question, I guess, is more for Gleb, but I just wanted to get more on the success that you guys are seeing with the AI customers, following the go-to-market transformation initiatives we've put in place. Can you just talk to the improved visibility you have for those AI customers in the pipe? As you have more of these customers, I guess, begin to season, is there a significant departure as far as cohort behavior or sales cycles? Then I just have a follow-up.
Mike Cikos: Hey, guys. Thanks for taking the question here. Congratulations on the strong start to calendar 2026. First question, I guess, is more for Gleb, but I just wanted to get more on the success that you guys are seeing with the AI customers, following the go-to-market transformation initiatives we've put in place. Can you just talk to the improved visibility you have for those AI customers in the pipe? As you have more of these customers, I guess, begin to season, is there a significant departure as far as cohort behavior or sales cycles? Then I just have a follow-up.
Speaker #3: Can you just talk to the improved visibility you have for those AI customers in the pipe and as you have more of these customers?
Speaker #3: I guess, begin to season? Are you noticing? Is there a significant departure as far as cohort behavior or sales cycles? And then I just have a follow-up.
Speaker #4: Hey, Mike. Thanks for the question. I'll use actually the two customers that I referenced in my prepared remarks as a good example. So, one of the customers came to us through the GTM motion that we're building, right?
Gleb Budman: Hey, Mike. Thanks for the question. You know, I'll use actually the two customers that I referenced in my prepared remarks as a good example. One of the customers came to us through the GTM motion that we're building, right? The machine that we're building, the combination of outbound targeting better systems going to the AI events. We found them through that outbound process. The other one actually came to us as a referral from one of our existing AI customers who said that they were having a great experience, and specifically, they were saying that they the combination of the performance that they were getting from our platform at the price point that they were getting was unmatched, they re-referred them over.
Gleb Budman: Hey, Mike. Thanks for the question. You know, I'll use actually the two customers that I referenced in my prepared remarks as a good example. One of the customers came to us through the GTM motion that we're building, right? The machine that we're building, the combination of outbound targeting better systems going to the AI events. We found them through that outbound process.
Speaker #4: So the machine that we're building, the combination of outbound targeting, better systems, going to the AI events—so we found them through that outbound process.
Speaker #4: The other one, actually, came to us as a referral from one of our existing AI customers who said that they were having a great experience and specifically they were saying that they the combination of the performance that they were getting from our platform at the price point that they were getting was unmatched.
Gleb Budman: The other one actually came to us as a referral from one of our existing AI customers who said that they were having a great experience, and specifically, they were saying that they the combination of the performance that they were getting from our platform at the price point that they were getting was unmatched, they re-referred them over.
Speaker #4: And so they referred them over. And so we're seeing more AI companies coming to us. We kind of feel like the market is coming our way, and it's really from both—part of it is from the work that we're doing, part of it is from the referrals and the market coming to us.
Gleb Budman: We're seeing more AI companies coming to us. We kind of feel like the market is coming our way, and it's really from both of these. Part of it is from the work that we're doing, part of it is from the referrals in the market coming to us. Maybe that answers kind of the first part of that. In terms of the cohort part of it, maybe you can ask your question if I didn't completely get it. One of the things we mentioned on the prior call is that we're seeing the AI companies growing much faster, about 3 times faster than our average customer, and that's just a function of their inherent data growth, driven by their AI use cases. Did that answer the question you were asking?
Gleb Budman: We're seeing more AI companies coming to us. We kind of feel like the market is coming our way, and it's really from both of these. Part of it is from the work that we're doing, part of it is from the referrals in the market coming to us. Maybe that answers kind of the first part of that. In terms of the cohort part of it, maybe you can ask your question if I didn't completely get it. One of the things we mentioned on the prior call is that we're seeing the AI companies growing much faster, about 3 times faster than our average customer, and that's just a function of their inherent data growth, driven by their AI use cases. Did that answer the question you were asking?
Speaker #4: So that maybe answers kind of the first part of that. In terms of the cohort part of it—maybe you can ask your question if I didn’t completely get it—but one of the things we mentioned on the prior call is that we’re seeing the AI companies growing much faster, about three times faster than our average customer.
Speaker #4: And that's just a function of their inherent data growth driven by their AI use cases. Did that answer the question you were asking?
Speaker #3: It does. It does. Thank you for that. And then for the follow-up, I think it might be more geared towards Marc, but I just wanted to double-check on the B2 with the NOR of 110%.
Mike Cikos: It does. It does. Thank you for that. Then for the follow-up, I think it might be more geared towards Marc, but I just wanted to double-check. On the B2 with the NRR of 110%, I know you said, "Hey, we drive that between two factors," right? You have the data consumption, which grows each year, then you also have the cross-sell, up-sell. I just wanted to see, could we unpack that a little bit more to get evidence of the go-to-market actually driving adoption, whether it is the cross-sell, up-sell motion? What are the drivers behind that B2 NRR today, if I'm trying to unpack consumption growth versus go-to-market initiatives to expand wallet and drive additional offerings into the installed base?
Mike Cikos: It does. It does. Thank you for that. Then for the follow-up, I think it might be more geared towards Marc, but I just wanted to double-check. On the B2 with the NRR of 110%, I know you said, "Hey, we drive that between two factors," right? You have the data consumption, which grows each year, then you also have the cross-sell, up-sell. I just wanted to see, could we unpack that a little bit more to get evidence of the go-to-market actually driving adoption, whether it is the cross-sell, up-sell motion? What are the drivers behind that B2 NRR today, if I'm trying to unpack consumption growth versus go-to-market initiatives to expand wallet and drive additional offerings into the installed base?
Speaker #3: I know you said, hey, we drive that between two factors, right? You have the data consumption, which grows each year, and then you also have the cross-sell, upsell.
Speaker #3: And I just wanted to see, can we unpack that a little bit more to get evidence of the go-to-market actually driving adoption whether it is the cross-sell upsell motion?
Speaker #3: What are the drivers behind that B2 NOR today? If I'm trying to unpack consumption growth versus go-to-market initiatives to expand wallet and drive additional offerings into the installed base?
Speaker #4: Yeah. Hey, Mike. I'll start off by saying I think the best evidence of the GTM working is the RPO disclosure of committed contracts that change quarter over quarter.
Marc Suidan: Yeah. Hey, Mike. I'll start off by saying I think the best evidence of the GTM working is the RPO disclosure of committed contracts that change quarter over quarter. For commitments of less than a year, it's up $3.4 million. You could see it on slide 19 of our earnings deck. I think that's the best evidence of the performance. Now, that is made up of both new logo as well as expansion sale. The expansion sale realistically does fluctuate. You know, on the NRR, we did move to in-quarter reporting versus a trailing four-quarter average, specifically to give you more visibility and to hold us accountable to explain what's happening. There will be more fluctuation there from that perspective.
Marc Suidan: Yeah. Hey, Mike. I'll start off by saying I think the best evidence of the GTM working is the RPO disclosure of committed contracts that change quarter over quarter. For commitments of less than a year, it's up $3.4 million. You could see it on slide 19 of our earnings deck. I think that's the best evidence of the performance. Now, that is made up of both new logo as well as expansion sale. The expansion sale realistically does fluctuate. You know, on the NRR, we did move to in-quarter reporting versus a trailing four-quarter average, specifically to give you more visibility and to hold us accountable to explain what's happening. There will be more fluctuation there from that perspective.
Speaker #4: So for commitments of less than a year, it's up $3.4 million. You could see it on slide 19 of our earnings deck. So I think that's the best evidence of the performance.
Speaker #4: Now, that is made up of both new logo as well as expansion sale. The expansion sale, realistically, does fluctuate. On the NOR, we did move to in-quarter reporting versus the trailing four-quarter average, specifically to give you more visibility and to hold us accountable to explain what's happening.
Speaker #4: So there will be more fluctuation there from that perspective. So it's up to 110% from 105% a year ago. Because a year ago was a quarter where we did talk about one customer, one large customer, going away.
Marc Suidan: It's up to 110% from 105% a year ago, because a year ago was the quarter where we did talk about one customer, one large customer going away. I mean, since I've joined, that was the only time we've had to reference that. That's what drove that improvement year over year. It generally fluctuates around 110 on a stable basis, but there's gonna be some ups and downs, and the expansion changes will be the biggest driver of that 'cause the organic growth tends to be incredibly stable and predictable.
Marc Suidan: It's up to 110% from 105% a year ago, because a year ago was the quarter where we did talk about one customer, one large customer going away. I mean, since I've joined, that was the only time we've had to reference that. That's what drove that improvement year over year. It generally fluctuates around 110 on a stable basis, but there's gonna be some ups and downs, and the expansion changes will be the biggest driver of that 'cause the organic growth tends to be incredibly stable and predictable.
Speaker #4: I mean, since I've joined, that was the only time we've had to reference that. So that's what drove that improvement year over year. But it generally fluctuates around 110 on a stable basis, but there are going to be some ups and downs.
Speaker #4: And the expansion changes will be the biggest driver of that, because the organic growth tends to be incredibly stable and predictable.
Speaker #3: Excellent. Thank you so much. And congrats again on this strong start to the year.
Mike Cikos: Excellent. Thank you so much, and congrats again on a strong start to the year.
Mike Cikos: Excellent. Thank you so much, and congrats again on a strong start to the year.
Speaker #2: And our next question comes from the line of Etai Kidron with Oppenheimer. Your line is open.
Operator 2: Our next question comes from the line of Ittai Kidron with Oppenheimer. Your line is open.
Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Ittai Kidron with Oppenheimer. Your line is open.
Ittai Kidron: Thanks. Hey, guys, and congrats. Great, solid numbers. I had a couple of things, maybe starting with you, Marc. Can you give us a little bit more color on the pricing update, the magnitude of this, how much of this you think you can capture? I'm just trying to think about your growth without the pricing update. How would your outlook have looked without it? I'm just trying to get my hands around that.
Speaker #5: Thanks, hey guys, and congrats. Great saw the numbers. I had a couple of things maybe starting with you, Mark. Can you be a little bit more can you give us a little bit more color on the pricing update, the magnitude of this, how much of this you think you can capture?
Ittai Kidron: Thanks. Hey, guys, and congrats. Great, solid numbers. I had a couple of things, maybe starting with you, Marc. Can you give us a little bit more color on the pricing update, the magnitude of this, how much of this you think you can capture? I'm just trying to think about your growth without the pricing update. How would your outlook have looked without it? I'm just trying to get my hands around that.
Speaker #5: I'm just trying to think about your growth without the pricing update. How would your outlook would have looked without it? I'm just trying to get my hands around that.
Speaker #4: Yeah, absolutely, Etai. So, in the $5 million raise for the year, half of it is from the pricing and packaging change; half of it is from the strength of the business that we observed in Q1.
Marc Suidan: Yeah, absolutely, Ittai. In the USD 5 million raise for the year, half of it is from the pricing and packaging change, half of it is from the strength of the business that we observed in Q1. The bookings, the strong bookings in Q1. If you look at that RPO number I referenced just a few moments ago, that kind of roughly equates to the raise from the organic health of the business for the rest of the year, 'cause that has no price increase in it. We continue to guide very prudently for the rest of the year. The same philosophy we laid out last time, which is no large customers, no go-to-market benefits, and not accounting for large variability of a, of that large customer.
Marc Suidan: Yeah, absolutely, Ittai. In the USD 5 million raise for the year, half of it is from the pricing and packaging change, half of it is from the strength of the business that we observed in Q1. The bookings, the strong bookings in Q1. If you look at that RPO number I referenced just a few moments ago, that kind of roughly equates to the raise from the organic health of the business for the rest of the year, 'cause that has no price increase in it.
Speaker #4: So the bookings, the strong bookings in Q1. So if you look at that RPO number I referenced, just a few of roughly equates to the raise from the organic health of the business for the rest of the year.
Speaker #4: Because that has no price increase in it. We continue to guide very prudently for the rest of the year. So the same philosophy we laid out last time, which is no large customers, no go-to-market benefits, and not accounting for large variability of that large customer.
Marc Suidan: We continue to guide very prudently for the rest of the year. The same philosophy we laid out last time, which is no large customers, no go-to-market benefits, and not accounting for large variability of a, of that large customer. What I would say also within Q2, I could give you a bit more color there. You know, last time, we said Q2 would grow by, for B2, would grow by 12% year over year.
Speaker #4: What I would say, also within Q2—I could give you a bit more color there. Last time, we said Q2 would grow by, for B2, would grow by 12% year over year.
Marc Suidan: What I would say also within Q2, I could give you a bit more color there. You know, last time, we said Q2 would grow by, for B2, would grow by 12% year over year. Now it's 20%. That difference is more anchored on the organic health of the business 'cause the price change took effect May 1, so it's not a full quarter, and we obviously actualize some of the things we saw in April in the business. On the price, I mean, we could elaborate a bit more on that price change. It's not a flat price change. It's a pricing and packaging change. For instance, we are including now transaction API fees. In the spirit of being the simplest billing model out there, we further simplified by no longer billing customers for transaction fees.
Speaker #4: Now it's 20%. That difference is more anchored on the organic health of the business because the price change took effect May 1. So it's not a full quarter.
Marc Suidan: Now it's 20%. That difference is more anchored on the organic health of the business 'cause the price change took effect May 1, so it's not a full quarter, and we obviously actualize some of the things we saw in April in the business. On the price, I mean, we could elaborate a bit more on that price change. It's not a flat price change. It's a pricing and packaging change. For instance, we are including now transaction API fees. In the spirit of being the simplest billing model out there, we further simplified by no longer billing customers for transaction fees.
Speaker #4: And we obviously actualized some of the things we saw in April in the business. And on the price, I mean, we could elaborate a bit more on that price change.
Speaker #4: It's not a flat price change; it's a pricing and packaging change. So for instance, we are including now transaction API fees. So in the spirit of being the simplest billing model out there, we further simplified by no longer billing customers for transaction fees.
Speaker #3: Got it. Okay. And then as a follow-up, maybe one for each of you. Mark, for you on the Computer Backup—the net retention rate is now well below 100.
Ittai Kidron: Got it. Okay. As a follow-up, maybe one for each of you. Marc, for you on the Computer Backup, the net retention rate is now well below 100, is this a business we should model towards decline now going forward? For you, Gleb, on the go-to-market side, great to see the progress there. What else is left here? What is it that, between now and year-end still needs to kick in that hasn't, from your perspective?
Ittai Kidron: Got it. Okay. As a follow-up, maybe one for each of you. Marc, for you on the Computer Backup, the net retention rate is now well below 100, is this a business we should model towards decline now going forward? For you, Gleb, on the go-to-market side, great to see the progress there. What else is left here? What is it that, between now and year-end still needs to kick in that hasn't, from your perspective?
Speaker #3: So is this a model—is this a business—we should model towards decline now, going forward? And for you, Gleb, on the go-to-market side, great to see the progress there.
Speaker #3: What else is left here? What is it that, between now and year-end, still needs to kick in that hasn't, from your perspective?
Speaker #4: Yeah. So Etai, just to reiterate the we're still thinking of computer backup as declining year over year, 5%. And the NOR is going to be tightly tied to that because it's a subscription business, not consumptive.
Marc Suidan: Yeah. Ittai, just to reiterate, we're still thinking of Computer Backup as declining year over year 5%. You know, the NRR is gonna be tightly tied to that 'cause it's a subscription business, not consumptive, which would mean that B2 would grow 24% year over year. The change in outlook is pretty much all on B2, and Computer Backup remains at a decline of 5% is what we're forecasting and guiding.
Marc Suidan: Yeah. Ittai, just to reiterate, we're still thinking of Computer Backup as declining year over year 5%. You know, the NRR is gonna be tightly tied to that 'cause it's a subscription business, not consumptive, which would mean that B2 would grow 24% year over year. The change in outlook is pretty much all on B2, and Computer Backup remains at a decline of 5% is what we're forecasting and guiding.
Speaker #4: Which would mean that B2 would grow 24% year over year. So, the change in outlook is pretty much all on B2, and Computer Backup remains at a decline of 5%—is what we're forecasting.
Speaker #4: And guiding.
Speaker #5: Etai, thanks for the question about the GTM transformation—what's done, and what we still have to do. So, what I'll say is: I think we've made great progress this quarter.
Gleb Budman: Ittai, I think you asked the question about the GTM transformation, what's done, and what we have to do still.
Gleb Budman: Ittai, I think you asked the question about the GTM transformation, what's done, and what we have to do still.
Ittai Kidron: Yeah.
Ittai Kidron: Yeah.
Gleb Budman: What I'll say is I think we've made great progress this quarter, and there's still a variety of things that we wanna get further, right? We hired Anuj Kumar to run that organization. I've asked Jason, who's with us, to take on and focus most of his time on the Neocloud opportunity. Jason works for Anuj. You know, we see that as a $14 billion opportunity, so we're putting focus and resources on that specific part of the opportunity with Jason focusing on that. The awareness generation is off to a good start with Flamethrower. You know, it's only been a couple months in. We've, you know, we've been moving faster than I think expected on that.
Gleb Budman: What I'll say is I think we've made great progress this quarter, and there's still a variety of things that we wanna get further, right? We hired Anuj Kumar to run that organization. I've asked Jason, who's with us, to take on and focus most of his time on the Neocloud opportunity. Jason works for Anuj. You know, we see that as a $14 billion opportunity, so we're putting focus and resources on that specific part of the opportunity with Jason focusing on that. The awareness generation is off to a good start with Flamethrower. You know, it's only been a couple months in. We've, you know, we've been moving faster than I think expected on that.
Speaker #5: And there's still a variety of things that we want to get further, right? So we hired Anuj Kumar to run that organization. I've asked Jason, who's with us, to take on and focus most of his time on the NeoCloud opportunity.
Speaker #5: So Jason works for Anuj. And we see that as a $14 billion opportunity. So we're putting focus and resources on that specific part of the opportunity with Jason focusing on that.
Speaker #5: The awareness generation is off to a good start with Flamethrower. But it's only been a couple of months in. And so we've been moving faster than I think expected on that.
Speaker #5: And we've been invited to participate in some great organizations and partnerships with A16Z, Startup Grind, and Launch. But there's a lot of opportunity there still, between that and the open source developer efforts that we're doing.
Gleb Budman: We've been invited to participate in some great organizations and partnerships with, you know, a16z and the Startup Grind and Launch. It's, you know, there's a lot of opportunity there still between that and the open source developer efforts that we're doing. There's still a lot of opportunity to make sure that everyone thinks of Backblaze as their first spot for their price performance storage. There's, you know, there's a lot that we've done. There's still, I think, a lot of opportunity that we have. I am excited that we're seeing pipeline growth stronger than we've seen in the past. We're seeing more of our sales team hitting their quota than we've ever seen in the past.
Gleb Budman: We've been invited to participate in some great organizations and partnerships with, you know, a16z and the Startup Grind and Launch. It's, you know, there's a lot of opportunity there still between that and the open source developer efforts that we're doing. There's still a lot of opportunity to make sure that everyone thinks of Backblaze as their first spot for their price performance storage.
Speaker #5: There's still a lot of opportunity to make sure that everyone thinks of Backblaze as their first spot for price performance storage. So there's a lot that we've done.
Gleb Budman: There's, you know, there's a lot that we've done. There's still, I think, a lot of opportunity that we have. I am excited that we're seeing pipeline growth stronger than we've seen in the past. We're seeing more of our sales team hitting their quota than we've ever seen in the past. A lot of the right things are happening, but we still, you know, we're always gonna keep working on it.
Speaker #5: There's still, I think, a lot of opportunity that we have. There's, I am excited that we're seeing pipeline growth stronger than we've seen in the past.
Speaker #5: We're seeing more of our sales team hitting their quota than we've ever seen in the past. So a lot of the right things are happening.
Gleb Budman: A lot of the right things are happening, but we still, you know, we're always gonna keep working on it.
Speaker #5: But we still we're always going to keep working on it.
Speaker #3: I appreciate it. Good luck. Thanks.
Marc Suidan: Appreciate it. Good luck. Thanks.
Ittai Kidron: Appreciate it. Good luck. Thanks.
Speaker #2: And our next question comes from the line of Eric Sepeter with B. Riley Securities. Your line is open.
Operator 2: Our next question comes from the line of Eric Safture with B. Riley Securities. Your line is open.
Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Eric Safture with B. Riley Securities. Your line is open.
Speaker #5: Yeah. Thanks for taking the question and congrats on a real good quarter. Can you speak to what portion of the NeoCloud market you're either servicing or at least engaged with?
Eric Safture: Yeah, thanks for taking the question, and congrats on a real good quarter. Can you speak to what portion of the NeoCloud market you're either servicing or at least engaged with? Where are you in terms of the hiring on the sales front? Are you adding additional salespeople at this point, or where are you on that from that perspective?
Eric Suppiger: Yeah, thanks for taking the question, and congrats on a real good quarter. Can you speak to what portion of the NeoCloud market you're either servicing or at least engaged with? Where are you in terms of the hiring on the sales front? Are you adding additional salespeople at this point, or where are you on that from that perspective?
Speaker #5: And then where are you in terms of the hiring on the sales front? Are you adding additional salespeople at this point, or where are you on that from that perspective?
Speaker #4: Yeah, thanks, Eric. So there are about 200 NeoClouds. We went to GTC, NVIDIA's premier conference, and had just a host of great conversations there at GTC.
Gleb Budman: Yeah. Thanks, Eric. There are about 200 Neoclouds. We went to GTC, the NVIDIA's premier conference, and had just a host of great conversations there at GTC. Yeah. Sorry, there was some noise on the line. What I would say is we're engaged with most of the top Neoclouds as part of it. The part that we are servicing for them is this data lake layer, right? If you think of the AI workflow, the GPUs themselves, there's the very low latency, high performance flash that you want adjacent to the GPUs. What you need is the place where you store all of the data, right?
Gleb Budman: Yeah. Thanks, Eric. There are about 200 Neoclouds. We went to GTC, the NVIDIA's premier conference, and had just a host of great conversations there at GTC. Yeah. Sorry, there was some noise on the line. What I would say is we're engaged with most of the top Neoclouds as part of it. The part that we are servicing for them is this data lake layer, right? If you think of the AI workflow, the GPUs themselves, there's the very low latency, high performance flash that you want adjacent to the GPUs. What you need is the place where you store all of the data, right?
Speaker #4: Sorry, it was some noise on the line. So what I would say is we're engaged with most of the top NeoClouds as part of it.
Speaker #4: The part that we are servicing for them is this data lake layer, right? So if you think of the AI workflow, there's the GPUs themselves.
Speaker #4: There's the very low-latency, high-performance storage that you want adjacent to the GPUs. And then what you need is the place where you store all of the data, right?
Speaker #4: So you can almost think of it if the whole AI workflow was a laptop, you've got your compute, your CPU, you've got the RAM, and you've got the hard disk or SSD, we are basically providing that hard disk layer.
Gleb Budman: You can almost think of it, if the whole AI workflow was a laptop, you've got your compute, your CPU, you've got the RAM, and you've got the hard disk or SSD. We are basically providing that hard disk layer. There's about half a dozen companies that provide that RAM layer. You know, the base Neocloud part is that CPU, GPU part. We're providing that large scale, high performance, not the highest performance, but high performance per dollar data lake layer for them. We're a white labeled provider for them. We're doing that, as we talked about on the last call, we've got, you know, the 6, 7, and 8-figure deals that we've signed for that.
Gleb Budman: You can almost think of it, if the whole AI workflow was a laptop, you've got your compute, your CPU, you've got the RAM, and you've got the hard disk or SSD. We are basically providing that hard disk layer. There's about half a dozen companies that provide that RAM layer. You know, the base Neocloud part is that CPU, GPU part.
Speaker #4: There are about half a dozen companies that provide that RAM layer. And then the base NeoCloud part is that CPU, GPU part. So we're providing that large-scale, high-performance—not the highest performance, but high-performance per dollar—data lake layer for them.
Gleb Budman: We're providing that large scale, high performance, not the highest performance, but high performance per dollar data lake layer for them. We're a white labeled provider for them. We're doing that, as we talked about on the last call, we've got, you know, the 6, 7, and 8-figure deals that we've signed for that. We have others that are in the works, and we're engaged with a bunch of the Neoclouds at this point.
Speaker #4: And so we're a white-labeled provider for them. We're doing that, as we talked about in the last call, we've got the six, seven, and eight-figure deals that we've signed for that.
Speaker #4: We have others that are in the works. And we're engaged with a bunch of the NeoClouds at this point.
Gleb Budman: We have others that are in the works, and we're engaged with a bunch of the Neoclouds at this point.
Eric Safture: Can you give us a sense of what portion of the Neoclouds out there, of the 200 that are out there that you're speaking to? Do you think it's a quarter? Any gauge on what penetration you've had?
Speaker #3: Can you give us a sense of what portion of the NeoClouds out there of the 200 that are out there that you're speaking to?
Eric Suppiger: Can you give us a sense of what portion of the Neoclouds out there, of the 200 that are out there that you're speaking to? Do you think it's a quarter? Any gauge on what penetration you've had?
Speaker #3: Do you think it's a quarter? Any gauge on what penetration you've had?
Gleb Budman: I think on-- in terms of the conversations and engagement side, probably somewhere around that number. I would say we're engaged with pretty much all of the top ones at this point, and having, you know, different levels of conversations and some in POCs, et cetera, with them. On the sales side of it, you know, we talked earlier this year that there were a number of different roles we wanted to fill. At this point, I'm excited to say we filled the, you know, the CRO role with Anuj. We filled the rev ops role. We filled the sales development role. And so we've got a really strong, kind of, build-out of that team now.
Gleb Budman: I think on-- in terms of the conversations and engagement side, probably somewhere around that number. I would say we're engaged with pretty much all of the top ones at this point, and having, you know, different levels of conversations and some in POCs, et cetera, with them. On the sales side of it, you know, we talked earlier this year that there were a number of different roles we wanted to fill. At this point, I'm excited to say we filled the, you know, the CRO role with Anuj. We filled the rev ops role. We filled the sales development role. And so we've got a really strong, kind of, build-out of that team now.
Speaker #4: In terms of the conversations and engagement side, probably somewhere around that number. But I would say we're engaged with pretty much all of the top ones at this point.
Speaker #4: And having different levels of conversations and some in POCs, etc., with them. On the sales side of it, we talked earlier this year that there were a number of different roles we wanted to fill.
Speaker #4: At this point, I'm excited to say we filled the CRO role with Anuj. We filled the RevOps role. We filled the Sales Development role.
Speaker #4: And so we've got a very strong kind of build-out of that team now.
Speaker #3: Very good. Thank you.
Eric Safture: Very good. Thank you.
Eric Suppiger: Very good. Thank you.
Gleb Budman: Mm-hmm. Thank you.
Gleb Budman: Mm-hmm. Thank you.
Speaker #4: Thank you.
Speaker #2: And our next question comes from the line of Jeff Van Ree with Craig-Hallum. Your line is open.
Operator 2: Our next question comes from the line of Jeff Van Rhee with Craig-Hallum. Your line is open.
Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Jeff Van Rhee with Craig-Hallum. Your line is open.
Speaker #6: Great, thanks for taking my questions, guys. A couple. First, just maybe, more—help me with the guide in the outlook. I'm trying to understand the progression here.
Jeff Van Rhee: Great. Thanks for taking my questions, guys. A couple. First, maybe, Mark, help me with the guide in the outlook. I'm trying to understand the progression here. At the end of February, Feb 2024, you took roughly $4 million out relative to the consensus, and now we're putting $5 million back in. I'm trying to understand, you know, in the Feb 2024 call, was the 1 May price increase in B2 already contemplated in the guide?
Jeff Van Rhee: Great. Thanks for taking my questions, guys. A couple. First, maybe, Mark, help me with the guide in the outlook. I'm trying to understand the progression here. At the end of February, Feb 2024, you took roughly $4 million out relative to the consensus, and now we're putting $5 million back in. I'm trying to understand, you know, in the Feb 2024 call, was the 1 May price increase in B2 already contemplated in the guide?
Speaker #6: So at the end of February—what, Feb 24—you took roughly $4 million out relative to the consensus. And now we're putting $5 million back in.
Speaker #6: I'm trying to understand—in the February 24 call, was the May 1st price increase in B2 already contemplated in the guide?
Speaker #4: Hi, Jeff. No, that was not contemplated in the guide. And in the $5 million increase, we just said half would be from the pricing, half would be from the organic momentum and health of the business we saw in Q1.
Marc Suidan: Hi, Jeff. No, that was not.
Marc Suidan: Hi, Jeff. No, that was not.
Jeff Van Rhee: Hi
Jeff Van Rhee: Hi
Marc Suidan: ... contemplated in the guide. In the $5 million increase we just did, half would be from the pricing, half would be from the organic momentum and health of the business we saw in Q1. The change is really, a lot of it is this guidance philosophy we spoke about, just a lot more prudent going forward. That's what drove the change.
Marc Suidan: ... contemplated in the guide. In the $5 million increase we just did, half would be from the pricing, half would be from the organic momentum and health of the business we saw in Q1. The change is really, a lot of it is this guidance philosophy we spoke about, just a lot more prudent going forward. That's what drove the change.
Speaker #4: And the change is, really, a lot of it is this guidance philosophy we spoke about—just a lot more prudent going forward. That's what drove the change.
Jeff Van Rhee: Did you, if you take the final month of the quarter, March and then April, was there, I don't know if radical is the right word to use, but did you see substantial improvement in close rate? Because it sounds like you're saying your conviction is coming both from improved bookings as well as usage. I'm trying to understand how Jan, Feb bookings were weak-ish, and then all of a sudden, March, April really killed it. I know you've made some process change over over time to sales, it was just such a quick snap. Maybe you can just help me dial it in there a little bit.
Speaker #6: Did you, if you take the final month of the quarter—March—and then April, was there, I don't know if 'radical' is the right word to use, but did you see substantial improvement in close rate?
Jeff Van Rhee: Did you, if you take the final month of the quarter, March and then April, was there, I don't know if radical is the right word to use, but did you see substantial improvement in close rate? Because it sounds like you're saying your conviction is coming both from improved bookings as well as usage. I'm trying to understand how Jan, Feb bookings were weak-ish, and then all of a sudden, March, April really killed it. I know you've made some process change over over time to sales, it was just such a quick snap. Maybe you can just help me dial it in there a little bit.
Speaker #6: Because it sounds like you're saying your conviction is coming both from improved bookings as well as usage. So I'm trying to understand how Jan-Feb bookings were weakish, and then all of a sudden, March, April really killed it.
Speaker #6: I know you've made some process changes over time to sales, but it was just such a quick snap. Is it—maybe you can just help me dial it in there a little bit?
Speaker #4: Yeah, Jeff, I mean, this is Cleveland. Maybe I'll touch on and then Mark could also weigh in. So we certainly had a more back-ended quarter in Q1.
Gleb Budman: Yeah, Jeff, I mean, this is Gleb Budman. Maybe I'll touch on, and Marc can also weigh in. We certainly had a more back-ended quarter in Q1, and we've started off Q2 strong. There's definitely enhanced feel from the numbers that we're seeing, right? I think, you know, we talked about, like, you know, the $1 million-ish deal that, you know, closed in 11 days. You know, that started and closed toward the end of the quarter. It wasn't, it wasn't the only deal, right? The pipeline itself has been building strongly this, you know, the table. I think we're layering that on along with the execution that we're doing on our own side.
Gleb Budman: Yeah, Jeff, I mean, this is Gleb Budman. Maybe I'll touch on, and Marc can also weigh in. We certainly had a more back-ended quarter in Q1, and we've started off Q2 strong. There's definitely enhanced feel from the numbers that we're seeing, right? I think, you know, we talked about, like, you know, the $1 million-ish deal that, you know, closed in 11 days. You know, that started and closed toward the end of the quarter. It wasn't, it wasn't the only deal, right?
Speaker #4: And we started off Q2 strong. So there's definitely enhanced feel from the numbers that we're seeing, right? And then I think— and we talked about the million-dollar-ish deal that closed in 11 days, that started and closed toward the end of the quarter.
Speaker #4: But it wasn't the only deal, right? The pipeline itself has been building strongly this April. And I think we're layering that on a long with the execution that we're doing on our own side.
Gleb Budman: The pipeline itself has been building strongly this, you know, the table. I think we're layering that on along with the execution that we're doing on our own side. I think that that's kind of the, I guess, the conviction and emotion side of things based on the data and the execution. I'll let Marc, if you wanna add anything on beyond that on the guide side of things.
Speaker #4: So I think that that's kind of the, I guess, the conviction and emotion side of things based on the data and the execution. And then I'll let Marc, if you want to add anything on beyond that, on the guide side of things.
Gleb Budman: I think that that's kind of the, I guess, the conviction and emotion side of things based on the data and the execution. I'll let Marc, if you wanna add anything on beyond that on the guide side of things.
Marc Suidan: I mean, Q4 bookings, back in Q4, bookings were good, but, you know, we wanted to hit that 30% growth, Jeff. To hit 30% growth, you know, we'd have to be booking, like, $5 million a quarter. Okay? We weren't at that rate yet, but it's been improving pretty much every quarter, and this latest Q1 is a further improvement, and probably the closest we've gotten, frankly. The demand signals are really strong. The demand signals being really strong, we're feeling good about the outlook, but we're still guiding with that prudence.
Speaker #3: Yeah. I mean, Q4 bookings, back in Q4 bookings, were good. But we wanted to hit that 30% growth, Jeff. To hit 30% growth, we'd have to be booking like $5 million a quarter.
Marc Suidan: I mean, Q4 bookings, back in Q4, bookings were good, but, you know, we wanted to hit that 30% growth, Jeff. To hit 30% growth, you know, we'd have to be booking, like, $5 million a quarter. Okay? We weren't at that rate yet, but it's been improving pretty much every quarter, and this latest Q1 is a further improvement, and probably the closest we've gotten, frankly. The demand signals are really strong. The demand signals being really strong, we're feeling good about the outlook, but we're still guiding with that prudence.
Speaker #3: Okay, so we weren't at that rate yet, but it's been improving pretty much every quarter, and this latest Q1 is a further improvement.
Speaker #3: And probably the closest we've gone to, frankly, and the demand signals are really strong. So the demand signals being really strong. Yeah, we're feeling good about the outlook, but we're still guiding with that prudence.
Speaker #3: And we'll use some of that price change to also fund some additional CapEx so we could have further capacity in place to handle that demand because we don't want to be in a position where we're declining any revenue opportunities.
Marc Suidan: You know, we'll use some of that price change to also fund some additional CapEx, so we could have further capacity in place to handle that demand because we don't wanna be in a position where we're declining any revenue opportunities.
Marc Suidan: You know, we'll use some of that price change to also fund some additional CapEx, so we could have further capacity in place to handle that demand because we don't wanna be in a position where we're declining any revenue opportunities.
Speaker #6: Yeah, yeah, got it, got it there. And just to follow up on that last piece then, in terms of the outlook for the year for CapEx for '26, I heard you reference it, but can you just give us a number there?
Jeff Van Rhee: Yep. Yep. Got it. Got it there. Just to follow up on that last piece then, in terms of the outlook for the year for CapEx for 2026, I heard you reference it, but can you just give us a number there? What are you expecting? Then also on the stock comp. Thanks.
Jeff Van Rhee: Yep. Yep. Got it. Got it there. Just to follow up on that last piece then, in terms of the outlook for the year for CapEx for 2026, I heard you reference it, but can you just give us a number there? What are you expecting? Then also on the stock comp. Thanks.
Speaker #6: What are you expecting? And then also on the stock comp. Thanks.
Speaker #4: Yeah. On the CapEx side, we're probably going to be around mid-30s as a percent of revenue. I would say there's three factors there. One, last quarter, we spoke about that large customer.
Marc Suidan: Yeah. On the CapEx side, we're probably gonna be around mid-30s as a % of revenue. I would say there's 3 factors there. 1, last quarter we spoke about that large customer we gotta service next year, so we need to get that CapEx in place now. 2, all the strong demand signals. 3, the general equipment cost is 30% higher than it was on a per unit basis from a year ago. For those 3 factors, we're beefing up our CapEx plan for this year, accelerating it from 2027 to this year.
Marc Suidan: Yeah. On the CapEx side, we're probably gonna be around mid-30s as a % of revenue. I would say there's 3 factors there. 1, last quarter we spoke about that large customer we gotta service next year, so we need to get that CapEx in place now. 2, all the strong demand signals. 3, the general equipment cost is 30% higher than it was on a per unit basis from a year ago. For those 3 factors, we're beefing up our CapEx plan for this year, accelerating it from 2027 to this year.
Speaker #4: We’ve got a service next year, so we need to get that CapEx in place now. Two, all the strong demand signals. And three, the general equipment cost is 30% higher than it was on a per unit basis from a year ago.
Speaker #4: So for those three factors, we're beefing up our CapEx plan for this year, accelerating it from '27 into this year.
Jeff Van Rhee: Mm-hmm. Yep. Your thoughts on stock comp?
Jeff Van Rhee: Mm-hmm. Yep. Your thoughts on stock comp?
Speaker #6: Yeah. And your thoughts on stock comp?
Speaker #4: I'd say pretty stable. If you look at our headcount, I mean, generally speaking, year over year, our headcount is actually coming down. So we're continuing to drive more efficiency out of the business.
Marc Suidan: I'd say pretty stable. If you look at our headcount, I mean, generally speaking, year over year, our headcount is actually coming down. We're continuing to drive more efficiency out of the business. Stock comp should be pretty stable in dollar terms. As a % of revenue, it does improve over time.
Marc Suidan: I'd say pretty stable. If you look at our headcount, I mean, generally speaking, year over year, our headcount is actually coming down. We're continuing to drive more efficiency out of the business. Stock comp should be pretty stable in dollar terms. As a % of revenue, it does improve over time.
Speaker #4: So stock comp should be pretty stable in dollar terms. And as a percent of revenue, it does improve over time. Jeff, the one thing I would also just mention since you bring up supply chain and the supply chain constraints and all that, what's interesting is we have to buy the equipment, right?
Jeff Van Rhee: Got it.
Jeff Van Rhee: Got it.
Gleb Budman: Jeff, the other thing, One thing I would also just mention, since you bring up supply chain and supply chain constraints and all that, what's interesting is, you know, we have to buy the equipment, right? We have to, you know, spend more on some of that side of things. The interesting thing is also we get two tailwinds from the supply chain being constrained.
Gleb Budman: Jeff, the other thing, One thing I would also just mention, since you bring up supply chain and supply chain constraints and all that, what's interesting is, you know, we have to buy the equipment, right? We have to, you know, spend more on some of that side of things. The interesting thing is also we get two tailwinds from the supply chain being constrained.
Speaker #4: So we have to spend more on some of that side of things. But the interesting thing is also, we get two tailwinds from the supply chain being constrained on the GPU side.
Gleb Budman: On the GPU side, Because the supply chain is constrained on the GPU side, customers are saying, Well, I need to go and have access to wherever the GPUs are available. We regularly talk with customers who say, I have to have my data somewhere that I can send it to whichever NeoCloud has the GPUs available. On the memory side, which is also obviously heavily constrained, the NeoClouds that offer cloud storage have been building out often on flash, and that becomes really expensive, especially now with the constraints there. It's driving additional interest from the NeoClouds in working with us on that data lake tier.
Gleb Budman: On the GPU side, Because the supply chain is constrained on the GPU side, customers are saying, Well, I need to go and have access to wherever the GPUs are available. We regularly talk with customers who say, I have to have my data somewhere that I can send it to whichever NeoCloud has the GPUs available.
Speaker #4: Because the supply chain is constrained on the GPU side, customers are saying, "Well, I need to go and have access to wherever the GPUs are available." And so we regularly talk with customers who say, "I have to have my data somewhere that I can send it to whichever NeoCloud has the GPUs available." And on the memory side, which is also obviously heavily constrained, the NeoClouds that offer cloud storage have been building out, often on Flash.
Gleb Budman: On the memory side, which is also obviously heavily constrained, the NeoClouds that offer cloud storage have been building out often on flash, and that becomes really expensive, especially now with the constraints there. It's driving additional interest from the NeoClouds in working with us on that data lake tier. On the one hand, we have to deal with, you know, pre-buying ourselves on the equipment side for CapEx, but on the other side, we get these two tailwinds to the business.
Speaker #4: And that becomes really expensive, especially now with the constraints there. And so it's driving additional interest from the NeoClouds in working with us on that data lake tier.
Speaker #4: So, on the one hand, we have to deal with pre-buying ourselves on the equipment side—for CapEx—but on the other side, we get these two tailwinds to the business.
Gleb Budman: On the one hand, we have to deal with, you know, pre-buying ourselves on the equipment side for CapEx, but on the other side, we get these two tailwinds to the business.
Jeff Van Rhee: That's helpful.
Speaker #6: That's helpful. Great. Congrats.
Jeff Van Rhee: That's helpful. Great. Congrats.
Marc Suidan: Yeah.
Jeff Van Rhee: Great. Congrats.
Speaker #4: Yeah, Jeff just stepped back on stock comp. I mean, if you look at the statement of cash flows, Q1, obviously, stock comp is higher as we settle some of our annual bonuses in equity as well.
Marc Suidan: Jeff, just to step back on stock comp, I mean, if you look at the statement of cash flows.
Marc Suidan: Jeff, just to step back on stock comp, I mean, if you look at the statement of cash flows, Q1, obviously stock comp is higher, as we settle some of our annual bonuses in equity as well. You'll notice this year's stock comp was actually lower than last year's.
Jeff Van Rhee: Mm-hmm
Marc Suidan: ... Q1, obviously stock comp is higher, as we settle some of our annual bonuses in equity as well. You'll notice this year's stock comp was actually lower than last year's.
Speaker #4: But you'll notice this year's stock comp was actually lower than last year's.
Speaker #6: That's helpful. Great, thanks. Congrats on the turn, guys.
Jeff Van Rhee: That's helpful. Great. Thanks. Congrats on the turn, guys.
Jeff Van Rhee: That's helpful. Great. Thanks. Congrats on the turn, guys.
Marc Suidan: Thanks, Jeff.
Gleb Budman: Thanks, Jeff.
Speaker #4: Jeff.
Speaker #1: And our next question comes from the line of Jason Ader with William Blair. Your line is open.
Operator 2: Our next question comes from the line of Jason Ader with William Blair. Your line is open.
Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Jason Ader with William Blair. Your line is open.
Speaker #7: Yeah, thanks. Good afternoon. I just wanted to get a better sense on the NeoClouds. What are the size of some of these deals? I know you talked about the eight-figure deal.
Jason Ader: Yeah. Thanks. Good afternoon. I just wanted to get a better sense on the NeoClouds. You know, what are the size of some of these deals? I know you talked about the eight-figure deal that's coming in, I believe, next year. Maybe just some more detail on some of the other deals that you've landed or are in the pipeline. Are we talking about, kinda, household NeoCloud names that are contracting with you know, potentially further kind of eight-figure deals. I mean, just, I think gauging kind of how significant an impact you might have from some of these NeoCloud opportunities would be helpful.
Jason Ader: Yeah. Thanks. Good afternoon. I just wanted to get a better sense on the NeoClouds. You know, what are the size of some of these deals? I know you talked about the eight-figure deal that's coming in, I believe, next year. Maybe just some more detail on some of the other deals that you've landed or are in the pipeline. Are we talking about, kinda, household NeoCloud names that are contracting with you know, potentially further kind of eight-figure deals. I mean, just, I think gauging kind of how significant an impact you might have from some of these NeoCloud opportunities would be helpful.
Speaker #7: That's coming in, I believe, next year. But maybe just more detail on some of the other deals that you've landed or are in the pipeline, or are we talking about kind of household NeoCloud names that are contracting with you for potentially further kind of eight-figure deals?
Speaker #7: I mean, I just think gauging kind of how significant an impact you might have from some of these NeoCloud opportunities would be helpful.
Speaker #4: Yeah, thanks, Jason. So first of all, we estimate that our opportunity in the NeoCloud market by 2030 is $14 billion. And that is just the data lake tier that we provide, right?
Gleb Budman: Thanks, Jason. First of all, we estimate that our opportunity in the NeoCloud market by 2030 is $14 billion, and that is just the data lake tier that we provide, right? That's not the entire storage footprint. The deals that we have signed, the 6, 7, and 8-figure deals that we've signed, I'll say two things. One is you would recognize them, right? They are companies that you would know. Two is that all three of those are initial deals. All three of them are ones where companies, the companies look at it as the way to start, not the total opportunity. I think, you know, there's Frankly, I can, I could see a path where the 6 and 7-figure deals could become 8-figure deals themselves.
Gleb Budman: Thanks, Jason. First of all, we estimate that our opportunity in the NeoCloud market by 2030 is $14 billion, and that is just the data lake tier that we provide, right? That's not the entire storage footprint. The deals that we have signed, the 6, 7, and 8-figure deals that we've signed, I'll say two things. One is you would recognize them, right? They are companies that you would know. Two is that all three of those are initial deals. All three of them are ones where companies, the companies look at it as the way to start, not the total opportunity. I think, you know, there's Frankly, I can, I could see a path where the 6 and 7-figure deals could become 8-figure deals themselves.
Speaker #4: So, that's not the entire storage footprint. The deals that we have signed—the six-, seven-, and eight-figure deals that we've signed—I'll say two things.
Speaker #4: One is you would recognize them, right? They are companies that you would know. And two is that all three of those are initial deals.
Speaker #4: So all three of them are ones where companies—the companies—look at it as the way to start, not the total opportunity. So I think there's, frankly, I can see a path where the six- and seven-figure deals could become eight-figure deals themselves.
Gleb Budman: You know, the 8-figure deal can, you know, certainly scale from where it is once it's ramped. That's kind of a little bit of that side of the opportunity. The other conversations that we're in, you know, many of them are, assuming they move forward, are of that same scale. Some of the conversations are, you know, we may wanna start with a 6-figure or 7-figure deal, but many of them, the scale of the opportunity, is 8 figures, at ramp.
Gleb Budman: You know, the 8-figure deal can, you know, certainly scale from where it is once it's ramped. That's kind of a little bit of that side of the opportunity. The other conversations that we're in, you know, many of them are, assuming they move forward, are of that same scale. Some of the conversations are, you know, we may wanna start with a 6-figure or 7-figure deal, but many of them, the scale of the opportunity, is 8 figures, at ramp.
Speaker #4: The eight-figure deal can certainly scale from where it is once it's ramped. So that's kind of a little bit of that side of the opportunity.
Speaker #4: The other conversations that we're in, many of them—assuming they move forward—are of that same scale. Some of the conversations are, we may want to start with a six-figure or seven-figure deal, but many of them, the scale of the opportunity is eight figures at ramp.
Speaker #7: Okay, helpful, thanks. And then just on the—I guess—the risk potentially that the NeoClouds add a lower-cost storage tier, and then you guys are helping them for a little bit, but then they kind of insource it.
Jason Ader: Okay. Helpful. Thanks. Just on the, I guess the risk potentially that the NeoClouds add a lower cost storage tier and then, you know, you guys are helping them for a little bit, but then, you know, they kinda in-source it.
Jason Ader: Okay. Helpful. Thanks. Just on the, I guess the risk potentially that the NeoClouds add a lower cost storage tier and then, you know, you guys are helping them for a little bit, but then, you know, they kinda in-source it.
Gleb Budman: You know, I mean, it's always possible, but it's a little bit like, you know, for the first almost two decades of Backblaze, one of the questions we were always asked was, you know, what happens if AWS ends up lowering their price to match you? You know, we're two decades in, and you know, that hasn't happened. I think that the challenge is it's not easy to build the type of IP that we have built up over the last two decades. You know, it's so it requires scale and expertise and a focus over a long period of time to get it really honed and right. The thing for the NeoClouds is they have a lot of things they need to do, right?
Gleb Budman: You know, I mean, it's always possible, but it's a little bit like, you know, for the first almost two decades of Backblaze, one of the questions we were always asked was, you know, what happens if AWS ends up lowering their price to match you? You know, we're two decades in, and you know, that hasn't happened. I think that the challenge is it's not easy to build the type of IP that we have built up over the last two decades. You know, it's so it requires scale and expertise and a focus over a long period of time to get it really honed and right. The thing for the NeoClouds is they have a lot of things they need to do, right?
Speaker #4: I mean, it's always possible. But it's a little bit like for the first almost two decades of Backblaze, one of the questions we were always asked was, "What happens if AWS ends up lowering their price to match you?" And we're two decades in, and that hasn't happened.
Speaker #4: I think that the challenge is, it's not easy to build the type of IP that we have built up over the last two decades.
Speaker #4: It requires scale and expertise, and a focus over a long period of time to get it really honed and right. And the thing for the NeoClouds is they have a lot of things they need to do, right?
Speaker #4: There's an opportunity around GPUs and GPU scaling and optimization and how do you make tooling better for inferencing and all kinds of things. Spending all their resources to try to replicate what we have built over the last two decades is probably not the best place for them to invest their own resources.
Gleb Budman: There's opportunities around GPUs and GPU scaling and optimization and, you know, how do you make tooling better for inferencing and all kinds of things. Spending all their resources to try to replicate what we have built over the last two decades is probably not the best place for them to invest their own resources when time to value is so much faster by using Backblaze.
Gleb Budman: There's opportunities around GPUs and GPU scaling and optimization and, you know, how do you make tooling better for inferencing and all kinds of things. Spending all their resources to try to replicate what we have built over the last two decades is probably not the best place for them to invest their own resources when time to value is so much faster by using Backblaze.
Speaker #4: When they can when time to value is so much faster by using Backblaze.
Speaker #7: Okay, great. And then, Marc, for you—just a couple of quick ones. So with the higher CapEx, are you still guiding for free cash flow positivity this year?
Jason Ader: Okay, great. Then Marc, for you, just a couple of quick ones. With the higher CapEx, are you still guiding for free cash flow positivity this year?
Jason Ader: Okay, great. Then Marc, for you, just a couple of quick ones. With the higher CapEx, are you still guiding for free cash flow positivity this year?
Speaker #4: Yeah, so the second half of the year, we're still guiding for that to be free cash flow positive for the whole year. I mean, Q1 was minus $1.8 million.
Marc Suidan: Yeah. The H2, we're still guiding for that to be free cash flow positive. For the whole year, I mean, Q1 was -$1.8 million. Q2 should be somewhere around neutral, and the H2 should be positive. Net net for the year, we should be, you know, neutral or very, you know, 1% of revenue free cash flow positive despite the acceleration of the CapEx.
Marc Suidan: Yeah. The H2, we're still guiding for that to be free cash flow positive. For the whole year, I mean, Q1 was -$1.8 million. Q2 should be somewhere around neutral, and the H2 should be positive. Net net for the year, we should be, you know, neutral or very, you know, 1% of revenue free cash flow positive despite the acceleration of the CapEx.
Speaker #4: Q2 should be somewhere around neutral. And the second half of the year should be positive. So net-net for the year, we should be neutral or very 1% of revenue free cash flow positive.
Speaker #4: Despite the acceleration of the CapEx.
Speaker #7: Okay. Great. And then just on the gross margin, just last question from me. Sorry. It sort of as I look at it through the last few years, I'm looking at just the not the adjusted gross margin, but the reported non-gap gross margin.
Jason Ader: Okay, great. Just on the gross margin, just last question from me. Sorry. As I look at it for the last few years, I'm looking at just the, not the adjusted gross margin, but the, you know, the reported non-GAAP gross margin. It was like mid-50s for a few years, and then last year was 62, roughly. 62 in Q1. Can you just remind us of like what caused the kind of the significant increase in the gross margin and then maybe some puts and takes going forward on that gross margin line?
Jason Ader: Okay, great. Just on the gross margin, just last question from me. Sorry. As I look at it for the last few years, I'm looking at just the, not the adjusted gross margin, but the, you know, the reported non-GAAP gross margin. It was like mid-50s for a few years, and then last year was 62, roughly. 62 in Q1. Can you just remind us of like what caused the kind of the significant increase in the gross margin and then maybe some puts and takes going forward on that gross margin line?
Speaker #7: It was like mid-50s for a few years, and then last year was 62, roughly 62 in Q1. Can you just remind us of what caused the kind of significant increase in the gross margin, and then maybe some puts and takes going forward on that gross margin line?
Speaker #4: Yeah, sure, Jason. So, if you go about a year ago, we reviewed the estimated useful life of our fixed assets. And it turns out we're using all our fixed assets for typically six years onwards.
Marc Suidan: Yeah. Sure, Jason. If you go about a year ago, we reviewed the estimated useful life of our fixed assets, and it turns out we're using all our fixed assets for typically 6 years onwards. We moved all the depreciation to 6 years. That drove a big benefit to gross margin. Second, all other lines, like if you think about all the labor or payment fees or everything else that fits to our cost of sales, we've managed really tightly year-over-year. It's kind of staying flat in absolute dollars pretty much, and improves as a % of revenue. We're looking at everything within our gross margin now to further drive optimization.
Marc Suidan: Yeah. Sure, Jason. If you go about a year ago, we reviewed the estimated useful life of our fixed assets, and it turns out we're using all our fixed assets for typically 6 years onwards. We moved all the depreciation to 6 years. That drove a big benefit to gross margin. Second, all other lines, like if you think about all the labor or payment fees or everything else that fits to our cost of sales, we've managed really tightly year-over-year. It's kind of staying flat in absolute dollars pretty much, and improves as a % of revenue. We're looking at everything within our gross margin now to further drive optimization.
Speaker #4: So, we moved all the depreciation to six years, so that drove a big benefit to gross margin. Second, all other lines—like if you think about all the labor or payment fees or everything else that fits into our cost of sales—we've managed really tightly year over year.
Speaker #4: So, it's kind of staying flat in absolute dollars, pretty much, and improves as a percent of revenue. We're looking at everything within our gross margin now to further drive optimization.
Speaker #4: But I would say between the price increase which benefits gross margin but the accelerated CapEx which will push on gross margin down, it should stay flat around where it is now.
Marc Suidan: I would say between the price increase, which benefits gross margin, but the accelerated CapEx, which will push on gross margin down, it should stay flat around where it is now. We're not guiding through any major changes in gross margin through the rest of the year.
Marc Suidan: I would say between the price increase, which benefits gross margin, but the accelerated CapEx, which will push on gross margin down, it should stay flat around where it is now. We're not guiding through any major changes in gross margin through the rest of the year.
Speaker #4: We're not seeing we're not guiding to any major changes in gross margin through the rest of the year.
Speaker #7: Okay. Thank you very much. Thanks, guys.
Jason Ader: Okay. Thank you very much. Thanks, guys.
Jason Ader: Okay. Thank you very much. Thanks, guys.
Speaker #1: And our next question comes from the line of Eric Martinuzzi with Lake Street Capital Markets. Your line is open.
Operator 2: Our next question comes from the line of Eric Martinuzzi with Lake Street Capital Markets. Your line is open.
Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Eric Martinuzzi with Lake Street Capital Markets. Your line is open.
Speaker #8: Yeah, I was just curious about the timing of the price increase. I went back and looked it up. I guess it was October of 2023 was the last time you raised the price on B2.
Eric Martinuzzi: I was just curious about the timing of the price increase. I went back and looked it up. I guess it was October 2023 was the last time you had raised the price on B2, and you really hadn't raised it since you rolled out the product back in 2015. We're at about the 2.5-year mark here with the price increase. Was this something that you felt like, hey, we're delivering more value, we need to capture more value, or was there competitive issues where competitors were raising price and kind of provided an umbrella for you to do the same?
Eric Martinuzzi: I was just curious about the timing of the price increase. I went back and looked it up. I guess it was October 2023 was the last time you had raised the price on B2, and you really hadn't raised it since you rolled out the product back in 2015. We're at about the 2.5-year mark here with the price increase. Was this something that you felt like, hey, we're delivering more value, we need to capture more value, or was there competitive issues where competitors were raising price and kind of provided an umbrella for you to do the same?
Speaker #8: And you really hadn't raised it since you rolled out the product back in 2015. So we're at about the two-and-a-half-year mark here with the pricing increase.
Speaker #8: Was this something that you felt like, 'Hey, we're delivering more value. We need to capture more value,' or was there a competitive issue where competitors were raising prices and kind of provided an umbrella for you to do the same?
Speaker #4: Yeah, thanks, Eric, for the question. So, we periodically reevaluate what the pricing and packaging of the offering should be. When we were looking at it, there were a few things that came together.
Gleb Budman: Yeah. Thanks, Eric, for the question. You know, we periodically reevaluate what the pricing and packaging of the offering should be. When we were looking at it, there were a few things that came together. One is that we've been investing more into the performance of the platform. More of our customers are using us in these hot use cases where we're driving high throughput, high IOPS. You know, we've been, you know, we made egress free before, and one of the things that that's enabled is not just that it's less expensive for the customers, but it allows them to actually run more frequent training of their models in the AI use cases. It's actually unlocking their ability to innovate. But that, you know, that makes it's free for them, it costs us money to provide that.
Gleb Budman: Yeah. Thanks, Eric, for the question. You know, we periodically reevaluate what the pricing and packaging of the offering should be. When we were looking at it, there were a few things that came together. One is that we've been investing more into the performance of the platform. More of our customers are using us in these hot use cases where we're driving high throughput, high IOPS. You know, we've been, you know, we made egress free before, and one of the things that that's enabled is not just that it's less expensive for the customers, but it allows them to actually run more frequent training of their models in the AI use cases. It's actually unlocking their ability to innovate. But that, you know, that makes it's free for them, it costs us money to provide that.
Speaker #4: One is that we've been investing more into the performance of the platform. More of our customers are using us in these hot use cases, where we're driving high throughput, high IOPS. What we've made that's enabled is not just that it's less expensive for the customers, but it allows them to actually run more frequent training of their models in the AI use cases.
Speaker #4: So it's actually unlocking their ability to innovate. But that makes it's free for them. It costs us money to provide that. So we've been working to increasingly provide more and more value to these higher performance, more active use cases.
Gleb Budman: We've been working to increasingly provide more and more value to these higher performance, more active use cases. We also wanted to simplify the pricing by removing transaction fees. The pricing and packaging combination, along with, as Marc said, you know, the underlying costs of the components have been increasing. Taking all of that together, we decided this was the right time to do that.
Gleb Budman: We've been working to increasingly provide more and more value to these higher performance, more active use cases. We also wanted to simplify the pricing by removing transaction fees. The pricing and packaging combination, along with, as Marc said, you know, the underlying costs of the components have been increasing. Taking all of that together, we decided this was the right time to do that.
Speaker #4: And we also wanted to simplify the pricing by removing transaction fees. So, it was a pricing and packaging combination, along with, as Marc said, the underlying costs of the components have been increasing.
Speaker #4: So, taking all of that together, we decided this was the right time to do that.
Speaker #7: Okay. And with regard to competitors, I mean, historically, you guys have thrown out the, "Hey, we're 80% cheaper than Amazon." Does this obviously, you're raising I think what I saw was about a 15, 16 percent per terabyte per month.
Eric Martinuzzi: Okay. With regard to competitors, I mean, historically, you guys have thrown out the, Hey, we're 80% cheaper than Amazon. This is obviously a raise in, I think what I saw was about a 15%, 16% per terabyte per month. Does that shrink that gap now, or, do you still feel like there's a delta?
Eric Martinuzzi: Okay. With regard to competitors, I mean, historically, you guys have thrown out the, Hey, we're 80% cheaper than Amazon. This is obviously a raise in, I think what I saw was about a 15%, 16% per terabyte per month. Does that shrink that gap now, or, do you still feel like there's a delta?
Speaker #7: Does that shrink that gap now, or do you still feel like there's a delta?
Gleb Budman: We are still dramatically more cost efficient than the alternatives out there. I was literally actually just talking to one of our account execs, a couple of days ago who was talking about a customer who has been ramping on our platform, and they said that they moved over a lot of their data, and they're continuing to move over more of their data, more of their use cases, because on the one hand, we're more affordable on the storage side, right? Just at the base level storage.
Speaker #4: We are still dramatically more cost-efficient than the alternatives out there. I was literally, actually, just talking to one of our account execs a couple of days ago, who was talking about a customer who has been ramping on our platform.
Gleb Budman: We are still dramatically more cost efficient than the alternatives out there. I was literally actually just talking to one of our account execs, a couple of days ago who was talking about a customer who has been ramping on our platform, and they said that they moved over a lot of their data, and they're continuing to move over more of their data, more of their use cases, because on the one hand, we're more affordable on the storage side, right? Just at the base level storage.
Speaker #4: And they said that they moved over a lot of their data, and they're continuing to move over more of their data, more of their use cases.
Speaker #4: Because, on the one hand, we're more affordable on the storage side, right? So just at the base level of storage. But where they were getting hit dramatically at their prior provider was that each time they egressed the data out from their provider to one of the other NeoCloud providers, they were getting hit with massive egress fees, one, and two, the transaction fees were actually costing them three to four times more than the cost of the storage at their prior provider.
Gleb Budman: Where they were getting hit dramatically, at their prior provider was that each time they egress the data out from their provider to one of the other Neocloud providers, they were getting hit with massive egress fees, 1, and 2, the transaction fees were actually costing them, 3 to 4 times more than the cost of the storage at their private, prior provider. When you put it all together, they were more than 5x more expensive at their prior provider, and they were literally wondering whether that was going to even be affordable for them to stay in business. The scale of total cost of ownership that we provide, on a benefit basis, is still quite dramatic.
Gleb Budman: Where they were getting hit dramatically, at their prior provider was that each time they egress the data out from their provider to one of the other Neocloud providers, they were getting hit with massive egress fees, 1, and 2, the transaction fees were actually costing them, 3 to 4 times more than the cost of the storage at their private, prior provider. When you put it all together, they were more than 5x more expensive at their prior provider, and they were literally wondering whether that was going to even be affordable for them to stay in business. The scale of total cost of ownership that we provide, on a benefit basis, is still quite dramatic.
Speaker #4: So, when you put it all together, they were more than 5x more expensive at their prior provider, and they were literally wondering whether that was going to even be affordable for them to stay in business.
Speaker #4: So the scale of total cost of ownership that we provide on a benefit basis is still quite dramatic.
Speaker #7: Got it. Thanks for taking my questions.
Eric Martinuzzi: Got it. Thanks for taking my questions.
Eric Martinuzzi: Got it. Thanks for taking my questions.
Gleb Budman: Mm-hmm. Thank you.
Gleb Budman: Mm-hmm. Thank you.
Speaker #4: Thank you.
Speaker #1: And our final question comes from the line of Rustam Kanga with Citizens. Your line is open.
Operator 2: Our final question comes from the line of Rustam Kanga with Citizens. Your line is open.
Operator: Our final question comes from the line of Rustam Kanga with Citizens. Your line is open.
Speaker #9: Great, glad, Mark. Thanks for taking my question. Nice, clean set of results here. Just one on B2 and Neo: as workloads begin to shift more towards inferencing from training, will that lead to improving predictability and visibility?
Rustam Kanga: Great. Gleb, Marc, thanks for taking my questions. Nice, clean set of results here. Just one on B2 and Neo. As workloads begin to shift more towards inferencing from training, will that lead to improving predictability and visibility? Then to that end, could you potentially share what percentage of Neo business on average or even directionally represents inference versus training workloads? Thanks.
Rustam Kanga: Great. Gleb, Marc, thanks for taking my questions. Nice, clean set of results here. Just one on B2 and Neo. As workloads begin to shift more towards inferencing from training, will that lead to improving predictability and visibility? Then to that end, could you potentially share what percentage of Neo business on average or even directionally represents inference versus training workloads? Thanks.
Speaker #9: And then to that end, could you potentially share what percentage of Neo business on average, or even directionally, represents inference versus training workloads? Thanks.
Speaker #4: Sure. It's a good question. And the first part of the answer is yes. As things move toward inferencing, it does make it easier to be more predictable.
Gleb Budman: Sure. It's a good question. The first part of the answer is yes. As things move toward inferencing, it does make it easier to be more predictable. Today, more of the use cases that we're seeing are related to model building, and that makes sense because a lot of the datasets right now that are very large and that need to be moved are related to the model building, and we're a great service for that. I'll give you an example. In the GenAI media space, I was talking about to a customer about their data flow.
Gleb Budman: Sure. It's a good question. The first part of the answer is yes. As things move toward inferencing, it does make it easier to be more predictable. Today, more of the use cases that we're seeing are related to model building, and that makes sense because a lot of the datasets right now that are very large and that need to be moved are related to the model building, and we're a great service for that. I'll give you an example. In the GenAI media space, I was talking about to a customer about their data flow.
Speaker #4: Today, more of the use cases that we're seeing are related to model building. And that makes sense because a lot of the data sets right now that are very large and that need to be moved are related to the model building.
Speaker #4: And we're a great service for that. But I'll give you an example. In the GenAI media space, I was talking about to a customer about their data flow.
Speaker #4: And the data flow is they accumulate a lot of data. They store that data. They annotate that data. Then they find a GPU provider that is available.
Gleb Budman: The data flow is they accumulate a lot of data, they store that data, they annotate that data, then they find a GPU provider that is available, and then they run iterative model building on the different GPU providers. They use us to store that large dataset, and as they acquire a new dataset, they use us to store more of those large datasets. They love the fact that they can store those efficiently and then send them quickly and for free to the GPU provider they want. They're using us in this whole model building process. As they do that, the other side of their business, the actual thing that they offer and they charge for, is generating videos. That's all the inferencing side.
Gleb Budman: The data flow is they accumulate a lot of data, they store that data, they annotate that data, then they find a GPU provider that is available, and then they run iterative model building on the different GPU providers. They use us to store that large dataset, and as they acquire a new dataset, they use us to store more of those large datasets. They love the fact that they can store those efficiently and then send them quickly and for free to the GPU provider they want. They're using us in this whole model building process. As they do that, the other side of their business, the actual thing that they offer and they charge for, is generating videos. That's all the inferencing side.
Speaker #4: And then they run iterative model building on the different GPU providers. So they use us to store that large data set. And as they acquire a new data set, they use us to store more of those large data sets.
Speaker #4: They love the fact that they can store those efficiently and then send them quickly and for free to the GPU provider that they want.
Speaker #4: So they're using us in this whole model building process. Now, as they do that, the other side of their business, the actual thing that they offer and they charge for is generating videos.
Speaker #4: That's all the inferencing side. And so they're looking at us for the outputs of all that video because every that video then gets stored basically forever and each version and each iteration gets stored forever.
Gleb Budman: They're, they're looking at us for the outputs of all that video because every single time a user generates new video, that video then gets stored basically forever, and each version and each iteration gets stored forever. We've become a great place to store that. That inferencing side is a much more smooth and predictable side. The short answer is yes, it will be more predictable as we get more inferencing. Today the bigger workloads that we see are related to model building because we're great for that. But we are seeing more inferencing start up on our platform. Okay, great. Thank you. Thanks, Russ.
Gleb Budman: They're, they're looking at us for the outputs of all that video because every single time a user generates new video, that video then gets stored basically forever, and each version and each iteration gets stored forever. We've become a great place to store that. That inferencing side is a much more smooth and predictable side. The short answer is yes, it will be more predictable as we get more inferencing. Today the bigger workloads that we see are related to model building because we're great for that. But we are seeing more inferencing start up on our platform. Okay, great. Thank you. Thanks, Russ.
Speaker #4: And so we become a great place to store that. And that inferencing side is a much more smooth and predictable side. So the short answer is yes, it will be more predictable as we get more inferencing.
Speaker #4: Today, the bigger workloads that we see are related to model building because we're great for that. But we are seeing more inferencing start up on our platform.
Speaker #9: Okay. Great. Thank you.
Speaker #4: Thanks a lot.
Speaker #1: And that concludes our question and answer session. I will now turn the conference back over to Gleb Budman for closing remarks.
Operator 2: That concludes our question and answer session. I will now turn the conference back over to Gleb Budman for closing remarks.
Operator: That concludes our question and answer session. I will now turn the conference back over to Gleb Budman for closing remarks.
Speaker #4: Thank you, everybody. Q1 was a proof point. We beat on revenue, beat on EBITDA. B2 was growing 24%. The deal size is more than doubled.
Gleb Budman: Thank you, everybody. Q1 was a proof point. We beat on revenue, beat on EBITDA. B2 is growing 24%. The deal size has more than doubled. The AI customers up 76% year over year. We are not just riding the AI wave, we're building the infrastructure that supports it. We are key for the Neoclouds, key for the AI builders, and we've had nearly two decades of optimizing performance per dollar at scale, which makes us ideal for the needs of AI. We raised guidance. We're on track for our first full year of free cash flow positivity as a public company, and we're picking up steam. Thank you to our customers, our partners, and thank you to our amazing team that's making all this happen. Thanks for joining our Q1 call, and we look forward to connecting on the next one. Bye-bye.
Gleb Budman: Thank you, everybody. Q1 was a proof point. We beat on revenue, beat on EBITDA. B2 is growing 24%. The deal size has more than doubled. The AI customers up 76% year over year. We are not just riding the AI wave, we're building the infrastructure that supports it. We are key for the Neoclouds, key for the AI builders, and we've had nearly two decades of optimizing performance per dollar at scale, which makes us ideal for the needs of AI.
Speaker #4: The AI customers up 76% year over year. We are not just riding the AI wave. We're building the infrastructure that supports it. We are key for the NeoClouds, key for the AI builders, and we've had nearly two decades of optimizing performance per dollar at scale.
Speaker #4: Which makes us ideal for the needs of AI. We raised guidance. We're on track for our first full year of free cash flow positivity as a public company.
Gleb Budman: We raised guidance. We're on track for our first full year of free cash flow positivity as a public company, and we're picking up steam. Thank you to our customers, our partners, and thank you to our amazing team that's making all this happen. Thanks for joining our Q1 call, and we look forward to connecting on the next one. Bye-bye.
Speaker #4: And we're picking up steam. Thank you to our customers, our partners, and thank you to our amazing team that's making all this happen. Thanks for joining our Q1 call, and we look forward to connecting on the next one.
Speaker #4: Bye-bye.
Operator 2: Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's call, and we thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's call, and we thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
