AllMind vs Marvin Labs

Marvin Labs costs $89 per user per month on Standard and $399 on Pro, with a free Evaluation tier; AllMind is quote-based and publishes no price. Those figures are the list prices on marvin-labs.com as of 30 August 2026, and an Enterprise plan is quoted on request, adding private-company coverage and optional on-premises or private-cloud deployment. Payment is by card through Stripe, with a 14-day money-back guarantee.

AllMind has no self-serve checkout and no monthly plan, and publishes nothing about what a quote turns on. So this is a per-seat tool an analyst can expense, set against a firm system priced in a sales conversation.

Marvin Labs covers 15 companies on the free tier, 300+ global companies on Standard, and those plus up to 50 names you nominate on Pro. Its documentation, updated 24 June 2026, adds that nominated names typically go live within 24 hours. Two other company pages say something broader, that any company communicating with investors in English is supported wherever it is listed, so the plan numbers are the safer figure to quote.

The corpus is what the company itself published: 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K filings, earnings call transcripts, earnings releases and decks, investor-relations materials and selected conferences. Third-party analyst research, financial media and social media are excluded by design.

Marvin Labs is not SOC 2 certified; AllMind has been SOC 2 Type II certified since November 2025. Marvin’s security page states it “does not hold SOC 2, ISO 27001, or equivalent formal certifications today”, and lists no public status page, no published SLA and no EU data residency by default among its own gaps. It says it will pursue certification when a customer requires it, and answers diligence questionnaires.

AllMind does not train on customer data, applies per-user entitlements agents inherit and can never widen, and logs every access. Its ISO 27001 is targeted for Q1 2027, so neither vendor satisfies an ISO mandate today.

Yes, for the job it defines: one analyst reading one company deeply. It cites answers to the passage, fires agents on earnings, and packages two primitives that are unusual off the shelf. Guidance Tracking scores management promises beat, met or missed when the period closes, and a daily 0 to 100 sentiment score compares peers.

The limits are the vendor’s own, not inferred. It declines a sector scan, a macro or cross-asset view, a real-time share price and a valuation call, and says financial models and reporting templates belong in dedicated modeling tools. It is a strong personal copilot and a weak substitute for a firm research system.

AllMind connects Snowflake, Databricks and S3 and queries them in place; Marvin Labs takes uploaded documents and MCP servers instead. AllMind adds Google Drive and OneDrive folder sync on Data Rooms, so internal data joins the licensed corpus rather than arriving file by file.

Marvin’s private document upload went live in late July 2026, filed against a company and readable by chat and agents. Uploads stay private on Standard and Pro, with organization-wide sharing on Enterprise, and Enterprise firms can have research imported automatically from SharePoint or Google Drive. Marvin also supports MCP in both directions, where AllMind publishes no MCP server of its own.

Marvin Labs tracks guidance as a purpose-built product; AllMind carries company guidance with revision histories but no named scorecard, and would run it as an automation. Marvin’s Guidance Tracking captures every forward-looking statement when it is made, links it across restatements, and scores it beat, met or missed when the period closes, with accuracy and discipline scores and a source-linked date. Three of its six predefined agents are guidance agents.

AllMind’s compare pages state that one automation can run up to 200 companies in a pass and deliver Word or PDF. The trade is a purpose-built scorecard over a 300+ company universe against a general automation over a much larger one.

A memo yes; a model no, on the vendor’s own account; a deck is not documented anywhere on its site. Marvin exports PDF, DOCX, Markdown or plain text with citations and branding intact, takes a firm template uploaded once, and configures an agent in natural language for headers, citation style, length and tone. Tables export to CSV or Excel and charts export as images.

AllMind generates PowerPoint decks from 20+ investment-bank templates, Word memos, and Excel models including DCF, LBO and comps with live formulas, and edits existing PPTX, DOCX and XLSX files. Those land in supplied templates, so a bespoke house format still needs a formatting pass.

AllMind is the closest alternative for an institutional team: a universe wider than 300+ companies, broker research and Expert Insights beside the filings, your own warehouse queried in place, and a current SOC 2 Type II report. Which matters depends on the boundary you hit first.

If your questions run across a sector rather than one company, you need a system that traverses relationships, which is AllMind’s ontology. If the names you cover are not on Marvin’s list, you need a platform priced on coverage. If vendor risk sets the floor, you need a current report and per-user entitlements. AllMind’s comparison index covers the other platforms teams shortlist.